Where I REALLY want to see AI implemented is in reffing. There are already programs / software that analyze every possible detail of games, especially those where they bet on them which of course includes college basketball. It should start with an audit of games where the software pre-programmed with all the rules determines when fouls should have been called, when a foot was over the line, 3 seconds, 5 seconds, 8 seconds, etc. THEN that data should be compared to how it was actually called by the human refs, with a disparity variance report. Imagine how powerful that tool would be. Fouls aside in the last game we lost by one there was a missed 3pt call that should have been a 2. Now of course since there is so much money bet on games, it would attempt to eliminate the human error/control factors (and home cooked reffing), but then the regulating body would have to be the NCAA or at the very least the SEC, and we all know how useless and unaccountable they are in the end all these things CAN be replaced by AI, the question is SHOULD they be.
Agree on all. Biggest thing though overall, and very disappointing, was that they came out ready to play and we did not and that big lead was too hard to overcome. We watch Auburn without their best player and a top 5 player in the country continue to play well, hoping they lose today, and that speaks to coaches getting kids ready to play. I’m shocked we came out the way we did, especially at home. Hope to see a dominant performance today. Based on upset at home we will need to upset a great team on the road to attempt to “catch back up”. This team should not be any worse than 11-7 or 12-6 in league play but losing to Mizzou as I said gives us much less room for error.
Sounds plausible. Might be made illegal but then there will be coaches with brain implants and you'd have to scan them to prevent it. Then of course AI robot coaches. Then the RBA. Hopefully they keep robot players out of colleges. Or at least limit them to bi-pedal models.
I think part of the problem is purely due to personnel. I like Clayton but he is not the greatest defender in the world. A lot of guards beat him on the first step leaving us exposed and requiring help.
