Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

College Football Playoff 2024 Thread

Discussion in 'RayGator's Swamp Gas' started by 62gator, Dec 8, 2024.

  1. Rkb75

    Rkb75 Senior

    296
    130
    1,838
    Sep 19, 2015
    Anyone know how the home CFB game tickets were allocated?
     
  2. 62gator

    62gator GC Hall of Fame

    11,430
    4,296
    3,303
    Dec 4, 2007
    Tampa, FL
    If they’re going to continue (I don’t think they should) to give out 4 byes, they’ve got to drop automatically giving them only to conf champs. In the second round 2 of those teams are double digit underdogs. Rank them 1-12 and give it to the 4 ‘best’ teams.

     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. gtr2x

    gtr2x GC Hall of Fame

    16,642
    1,537
    1,393
    Aug 21, 2007
    I was a fan of expanding to 12 teams and giving byes but....

    Maybe this season was just an outlier but maybe they need to scale back to 8 with no byes, not add more teams as some have said. Sure Ind and SMU weren't competitive but neither were Clemson or the Vols.
    Clearly home field advantage is huge in college football and makes for a great environment, not sure it's fair in the postseason.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  4. The_RH_Factor

    The_RH_Factor GC Hall of Fame

    1,594
    318
    1,883
    Aug 11, 2010
    Two by blowouts.

    What do you think of the current format?
     
  5. biggynugs

    biggynugs GC Legend

    500
    140
    1,828
    Apr 3, 2007
    Orlando, fl
    I do think higher seeds deserve some home field advantage.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    88,958
    26,798
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Thank you, Sankey... for making it part of the payoffs to play in the frozen tundra instead of inside domed stadiums up north.

    He is the worst SEC Commissioner in SEC history.

    One more thing, OSU looked so "fit" that I wonder if the NCAA is still testing for steroids. Even their Big-Nasties and Big-Uglies looked fit, that is as fit as a fatty in football can get... far too fit to be natural.
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2024 at 8:19 AM
  7. lerxst6

    lerxst6 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    205
    1,873
    Apr 11, 2007
    Naples
    None of the 4 were even competitive games. Pretty much a snooze fest
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  8. Agator88

    Agator88 GC Hall of Fame

    1,228
    412
    1,898
    Oct 7, 2014
    If you look at the last 25-30 years, how many times have you really thought more than 6 teams could win a title much less 12? I mean 2007 was a wild year, where no one team looked great, so a 12 team playoff that year would have been fun. Otherwise, I struggle to recall a season where the 6th best team actually stood a chance to win it if the current rules were in place.

    As a fan, I like more games, and I like seeing matchups you wouldn't typically see. It's obvious that the powers want this to be like the NFL where a wild card team can make a run, but to me there's more parity, but still not enough where you can see a 10 seed run the table to the title game.

    Penn state is at 6, and they have a shot to play in the title game, but to me that's because of their path only. SMU, Boise state, and possibly a UGA team with no QB.
     
  9. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    17,524
    4,480
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    The big 10 is top heavy and Indiana avoided playing the better teams with their schedule.. i think the bottom half of the sec is vastly superior to big 10, at least this year.. Tv deals want every conference represented but they should go straight ranking which they still cant right. Many here argued that indiana deserved to be a top 10 team so there you go.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    17,524
    4,480
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    If only someone could figure out the four best. They obviously cant figure out the 10 best.
     
  11. scooterp

    scooterp GC Hall of Fame

    2,250
    1,276
    2,703
    Feb 15, 2012
    100
     
  12. GatorKnight5

    GatorKnight5 All American

    398
    93
    1,843
    Sep 23, 2015
    There shouldn’t be automatic bids for winning your conference. And they definitely shouldn’t get byes. ASU and Boise state played no one all year. They got byes. Now they’re going to get destroyed by Texas and Penn state
     
  13. G8R92

    G8R92 GC Hall of Fame

    3,300
    373
    378
    Feb 5, 2010
    Some would like to see it expanded like the FCS format, but I don't see how you can expand the number of teams with these results. I like the first round being a home game for the higher seed especially in the cold weather sites.
     
  14. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    17,524
    4,480
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    I would rather have 16. Not that more teams are deserving but byes are bs. I also dont believe they had the 12 best teams in there.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. ocalaman

    ocalaman GC Hall of Fame

    7,839
    3,150
    2,498
    Jun 30, 2018
    Personally, I'm just glad they finally expanded the playoffs. FCS and the other smaller divisions have been doing this for years and it's great. 12 teams got a chance to play for the national title and I love the early games being on home campuses. Again, the smaller divisions play on the higher seeded home fields except for the national title game. Could the system put in place this year be tweaked? Sure, but I don't want a 12 team playoff with 6 teams from the SEC. I agree that strength of schedule should be weighed more heavily in the seedings, but I also like the idea of rewarding conference champions. The top seeds all won the first round, so it worked out. I'm just enjoying the ride and happy they FINALLY went to an expanded playoff field. Should have happened decades ago, IMO.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    17,524
    4,480
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    Except Boise did play Oregon and did very well. Maybe they can pull the upset. Bad qb play has plagued these games.Ewers and Howard arent workdbeaters but Imaleava just sucks.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. GatorKnight5

    GatorKnight5 All American

    398
    93
    1,843
    Sep 23, 2015
    I just think it’s silly to reward teams for playing easy schedules
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    17,524
    4,480
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    I like that they let asu in for winning their confernce but don't believe they deserved a buy. Id rather see 16 than asu or Bouse with a bye. Neither team beat anyone in the playoffs in the regular season. I get that they can only play who is on their schedule but it doesn't change reality just because the schedule is soft. Id love to see Boise win it all but they should do it from the 11 seed with asu at 12. Well we have to squish clemson in and take a better team out but whatever. Make it 16 and usce and ok piss could roll all those chumps.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  19. FranceGator

    FranceGator GC Hall of Fame

    3,822
    1,154
    1,993
    Apr 8, 2007
    @Gatorrick22 "He is the worst SEC Commissioner in SEC history." Can you give some detail on this? The growth of SEC basketball (men's and women's) is astonishing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,632
    767
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    I think the Gators would have given any of the first round winners a better game than any of the losers did. Might've even pulled the upset.

    I wouldn't mind seeing it scaled back to 8 teams. It's already clear that going to 16 teams will guarantee twice as many painfully uncompetitive games. I fell asleep and missed the end of all of them except the Texas-Clemson game.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1