Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Science wins again w/ Global Warming

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorFanCF, Dec 13, 2024.

  1. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,869
    1,859
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    this chart could exist if humans were causing global cooling. Empiricism is a tricky bitch.
     
  2. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    That is true. But his claim was that the sea level is not rising. That is false. Causation is obviously more tricky, but what he said is empirically false.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,021
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    You keep saying this and you are still wrong. One has to be willfully stupid to say such things.

    You are an embarrassment of a moderator. The fact that you moderate a board in the name of UF is just sad.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  4. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    124,014
    164,188
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    But sea levels have risen and fallen over the life of the Earth. Oklahoma at one time was under water.
    highest sea levels in history - Google Search


    According to current scientific understanding, the highest sea levels in recorded history occurred around 125,000 years ago during the last interglacial period, when sea levels were estimated to be between 6 and 9 meters (20 to 30 feet) higher than today, primarily due to melting Antarctic ice caused by a warmer climate.
     
  5. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,021
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    So what does this have to do with the price of tea in china?
     
  6. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    124,014
    164,188
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    It was probably underwater 125,000 years ago?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Okay. But first, we have to address this from the standpoint of empirical reality. Are the sea levels currently rising?
     
  8. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,021
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    so what?
     
  9. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,296
    783
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Large parts of humanity across the world believes in a a great flood, the cyclical nature of life, and God’s plans. I don’t think modern science alone will be able to convince anyone in a meaningful way. Perhaps an enlightened soul is required to explain the convergence of science and religion on this topic in a spiritual way.
     
  10. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    732
    260
    1,978
    Dec 8, 2008
    Herndon, Virginia
    …then demonstrate its inaccuracy. I mean, even petroleum companies acknowledge anthropogenic climate change.
     
  11. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    732
    260
    1,978
    Dec 8, 2008
    Herndon, Virginia
    Oklahoma was under water when we lacked polar ice caps entirely and had a different continental configuration.

    Climate change isn’t unique to people. This is obvious. The climate change we’re experiencing, at this time, is attributed to human activity. There is no other reasonable explanation.
     
  12. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    126,068
    57,322
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    it means nothing for 2 reasons
    1)even if I accepted this BS(which I do not) - as long as China and India are not involved in cutting back their emissions then any plan has zero chance of ANY success and why pour trillions of dollars into something that has ZERO chance of succeeding
    2) the scientists putting out of the GW BS have a vested interest in saying it is true as that is how they get their funding
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    1,858
    784
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    What is it we call someone who willfully ignores scientific data based on it not meeting their preconceived opinion? The huge irony/stupidity comes when poster claims he can ignore data because( with zero evidence) those scientists must be wrong because of vested interest. OMG . Poster asked for any prognostications from GW that came true--- was given two---- ignored ?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 16, 2024 at 10:42 AM
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  14. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    732
    260
    1,978
    Dec 8, 2008
    Herndon, Virginia
    1) China is leading the world in renewables, producing 43% of global output.
    . India is just behind China and the United States and rapidly gaining on the latter.

    2) Your continue insistence on corrupt intent is an ad hominem. Attack the topic. Further, and I’ll keep stating this even if it’s ignored in fits of cognitive dissonance, but it’s not just research institutions doing climate research and engineering solutions. Oil companies are doing it, against their vested interests. Governments are doing it. Heck, small engineering firms are doing it.
     
  15. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    10,311
    2,542
    3,288
    Dec 16, 2015
    You couldn’t see it.
    We’ve all tried to show you how corrupt the govt and the libbie agenda can be.
    You trust it and want more of it.
    Hell, you can’t get enough of it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  16. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    I noticed you didn't point out a single error in the data. Would you like to try again?
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 2
  17. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Look at Oklahoma's post above. Its an example of a GW issue that we identified and are solving.
     
  18. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,947
    881
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Since we are apparently very concerned about possible biases, the “scientists” who called it a hoax in the first placed worked for the petroleum Industry and had a vested interest in calling it a hoax. The funny thing is even the perpetuators of that “it’s a hoax” lie have mostly pivoted away from that argument. It’s mostly just crackpots and online fools who would even use that language anymore.

    Some links you won’t read.

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063

    Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago

    https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil/exxon-climate-change-documents-e2e9e6af
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  19. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Yes, we all know this. Now what should we do about the man-caused global warming we are currently experiencing?
     
  20. homer

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    2,746
    851
    2,078
    Nov 2, 2015
    Climate change used to be called summer, winter, spring, and fall.

    #runsawaylaughing
     
    • Funny Funny x 2