Science wins again w/ Global Warming

Did you read the last two paragraphs of your article?

 

Yeah, sometimes science is wrong. We know that because of science. That's how science works. It seeks to disprove itself. But one thing we know science has been right about for a long time now is that global warming is occurring and it's caused by the greenhouse gasses humans have spewed into the atmosphere.

 

I feel like it’s the non-scientists who think science is expected to be 100% right all the time. It’s a total misunderstanding of empirical naturalism. It’s indicative of the poor health of our educational system.

 

How does one read an article about measurement and time for a collapse of an ice shelf = climate change hoax. SMDH.

 

This article does nothing to contest the mechanism of climate change; it’s about the result of an improved simulation regarding the potential break up of a single glacier.

Read an article before posting it. Relying on the title and first paragraph is bad scholarship.

 

LOL, they only read the headlines.

Well, this was embarrassing.

 

Baffling. Critical thinking is one thing. This is 8th grade reading comprehension.

To think this is a site associated with a top tier public university is cringe.

 

I’ve had the same thought often myself. Not all posters are alumni and not all alumni remain grounded in the skills they should have learned at university.

 

I've said the same thing many times. Your first thought is to think you are dealing with fellow UF alumni here, but you're not...you are dealing with UF fans, a very obviously intellectually diverse group.

 

1. join the maga cult.
2. declare anything you disagree with fake news
3. Search tiktok and YouTube for confirmation
4. Declare yourself correct

 

Like the doj investigation that was initiated under djt.
Sadly, these same posters and the type post it elsewhere an people agree without even reading the info

 

Fishbowl logic. They chum the waters and giggle about the frenzy.

 

I’m stealing this.

 

You had no nuance about engineering solutions to climate change. You posted the same apologetics utilized by pro-hydrocarbon lobbying and media sources.

You provided no context regarding some sort of economic concerns. You just mentioned something about “paranoia.”

You know what worries me more than ice sheets? Ocean acidification and the breakdown of major global currents. Both of those have routinely had more alarming, independent papers recently.

The sad part is that we should have been aggressively dealing with carbon and methane emissions like yesterday, but we’re still kicking the can down the road for our kids/grandkids to hopefully figure out before climate change renders large swaths of the globe hostile to human activities.

 

Simply unbelievable given your commentary on the story in the OP. Every accusation is a confession lol. Were you not belittling people calling them paranoid and comparing them to religious zealots? Just shows how weak your argument is right?

 

So you don't think raising sea levels are damage? And you are actually arguing for not prioritizing this issue (by framing prioritizing it as "paranoia"), which runs directly contrary to what your own article is stating that we should be doing.

 

One single ice sheet that may not fall of and melt as soon as previously predicted does not equal AGW being a hoax. Sheesh.

 

(Wait until they find out that environmental migration is a real thing and not only happening on our border, but actively in East Asia.)