Jack Smith moves to dismiss case sgainst Trump

evidence is presented in a court of law, not on tik tok, not on you tube, not on fox news or msnbc or cnn. you keep discussing opinion, not evidence

when were the criminal trials in a court of law for the crimes he was indicted for held?

 

Well, there was one in New York. The jury convicted him of 34 felonies. He and his appointees in the federal courts successfully ran out the clock on the federal cases, with an assist from Biden's DOJ.

 

the hate any self-respecting individual that has any sense of truth, morality, or respect for others is directed towards the way he conducts himself. if that conduct defines who the man is, yes, people hate the man the same way they hate bigots, misogynists, racists, traitors, felons, rapists...and he is all of the above. I am also rapidly losing respect for anyone who tries to defend the pos and what he stands for.

 

Garland and Sullivan were both such terrible appointments. two beta passivists in positions that required strength

 

and that is my point. practically every time he has had to face the law to a conclusion based on facts and evidence, he loses

 

I thought Garland was a good pick at the time. I'll eat crow on that. He did a terrible job of meeting the moment.

 

Many people voted for a candidate who lost an election.

Many other people voted for a candidate who is a criminal, a rapist (or at least a sexual assaulter), and a traitor - who is the first POTUS in US history to try to not peacefully transfer power, and who criminally tried to overturn an election.

There's no shame in the first thing. There's nothing but shame in the second.

 

Apparently there is no limit to the amount of investigations or criminal trials against Trump.

Never mind the 2 impeachments and several dozen felony counts.

They politically lost again, which is what this is really all about so the answer is naturally more cowbell. More investigations handled by politically motivated attention-seeking prosecutors and more convictions by prejudicial juries.

Democrats have been claiming for the last decade that the next investigation will get Trump. Here we are 10 years later and he won every swing state and the popular vote.

Spin it however the Hell you want, the American people aren’t buying what you’re selling. Plain and simple.

 

they both followed the appeasement approach, don't upset the other side, be slow, careful. maybe great for the EPA but not DOJ and foreign policy at a time of conflict

 

There is certainly shame…
In voting for a dimwit libbie.
Glad you have been enlightened.

 

do you know that less than 50% of the voters voted for djt? that means that more people that voted wanted someone else besides djt to be potus

WHAT A MANDATE - more people voted against him than for him

2024 National Popular Vote Tracker | Cook Political Report

 

If Garland prioritized “not upsetting the other side,” in any way, I frankly can’t imagine how he could’ve done a worse job.

 

The GIF is super lame, but no....not really.

There's a difference between voting for someone who has policies you really don't like, versus.....

....voting for someone who enacts a conspiracy to overturn an election.

Or who abuses a position of authority to take advantage of, or assault females.


You voted for a guy who has a documented history of cornering females and jamming his fingers into their vaginas without consent. It's documented beyond the civil rape trial where a jury found him liable.

You must be so proud.

 

So that’s the standard now?

He doesn’t only need to win 270 electoral votes, he doesn’t only need to win more popular votes than any Presidential candidate, no… he needs to win over 50% of the popular vote despite third party candidates.

Denial is the first stage of grief, but I suggest you guys stop making excuses and actually reflect on why the American people completely rejected what you’ve been pitching for the last decade.

 

There was a lot of discussion on the right about how Democrats wanted to run against Trump again rather than DeSantis or Haley. By going after Trump legally, it put a lot of Republicans that were open to other candidates, back in Trump's camp. The raid on Mar-a-lago seemed to be the thing that really put Trump back in the driver's seat for the nomination.

 

Don't permit 715 to strawman his way out of this. He's now admitting that Trump is above the law and defending it on the idea that if a person wins enough votes, they should be treated better than everybody else. If that's your view, 715, so be it. But it only proves that we don't have a system that provides justice, much less equal justice. We have a system that lets some people get away with breaking the law because of their power and/or wealth.

 

^^ I know, Bill, that post deserved a funny rating.

Forcibly inserting your fingers into a woman's vagina is pretty funny, no?

People who do that, admit to doing that, and are found in court to have done precisely that, are both good and.... funny.

Sexual assault is now funny.