Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

War in Ukraine

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by PITBOSS, Jan 21, 2022.

  1. Tjgators

    Tjgators Premium Member

    5,027
    621
    358
    Apr 3, 2007
  2. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,779
    813
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2024 at 10:22 AM
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,121
    1,191
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    We don’t have corruption in the US because we call it lobbying.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator Premium Member VIP Member

    124,568
    56,512
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I am assuming that stands for US Defense Industrial Base

    While I am not an Isolationist, I am an America First. I vews DIB as a globalist type of organization
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,826
    867
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    The thing these jokers never seem to comprehend is most of this corruption in Ukraine is because of their previous ties to Russia and the former Soviet Union. It isn’t a random or coincidental phenomenon. The Russian gangster state is the nexus for the corruption in much of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet bloc states which never escaped their sphere, this includes Ukraine which while an independent state has had its share of Russian influence.

    The states that DID more successfully detach themselves from Russia generally became more successful and have relatively less corruption.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator Premium Member VIP Member

    124,568
    56,512
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I think if joey would have had some balls he could have ended things early on. Putin is a thug and knew joey would stand idly by when he moved on the Ukraine.
     
  7. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,779
    813
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    stood idly by?!? Biden was a key person to why Ukraine survived, especially in the first month. He rallied allies to help pump armaments into Ukraine and shared with the world what Russia was planning to do. It was close. He also spearheaded economic sanctions which are finally starting to wallop Russia. (21% int rates and 9% inflation reported but expected higher). I assume since you take more of a position of appeasing Putin you wouldn’t support sending US troops.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator Premium Member VIP Member

    124,568
    56,512
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I do NOT support sending troops - your jump to how that is somehow appeasing Putin is laughable
     
  9. Tjgators

    Tjgators Premium Member

    5,027
    621
    358
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,779
    813
    558
    Apr 13, 2007

    not sure I get the gotcha. the ravages of deforestation in the Amazon is a concern for many. Probably worthy of its own thread.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2024 at 11:34 AM
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,813
    1,066
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,779
    813
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
  13. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,953
    2,108
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Maybe. But talking about what one guy shoulda done or what the other guy woulda done at some point in the past is only interesting if you’re writing an alternative history novel. We are discussing what we should do now, and it sounds like you just said, “Let Russia have it, and we will all just hope the other countries like China don’t follow suit to take by force anything they think belongs them.”
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,167
    215
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    You understand that if the US DIB is not sufficiently rebuilt, peer adversaries like Russia and China will have a significant advantage against the US in any serious conflict?
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  15. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,944
    1,738
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Or "free speech". We all know that the campaign contributions are nothing more the legalized bribery although thanks to the SCOTUS which has labeled them a form of free speech the practice of that form of bribery is almost completely unregulated. Although the majority of American politicians are on the take one way or another the current President-elect is undoubtedly the best politician that money can buy.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,329
    14,404
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Sure...don't remember y'all bitching about Barry's hundreds of millions of filtered chicom donations, or sKamal's 1.5 Billion coming from God knows whom...

    ....yesh, the SCOTUS, and Citizens United, blah blah blah...
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  17. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,953
    2,108
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    The election is over. No longer any need to polish the turd that was Jake Sullivan’s response to Russian aggression. I agree with every measure you mentioned above, but it was still half-assed, insufficient, and often too late. Lots of inexcusable things we did or failed to do, especially in the early days and before: the assurances the President gave Putin that we would not intervene; our implication that as long as Putin “only took a small piece” we would accept without too much consternation; our encouraging Zelensky to surrender the seat of his government; our suspense of defensive arm shipments even after it was clear Russia fully intended to invade; our failure to immediately send heavy forces to Eastern Europe as a deterrent or at the very least as a means to make Russia keep a larger portion of its military unengaged in Ukraine; our having to be pressured by our own allies to stop buying Russian petroleum products; our having to be led by our allies at every step of providing material aid to Ukraine; our inexplicable insistence to keep trying to engage Iran via Russia even after hostilities had started and it was clear to anyone with more than two brain cells that both parties were playing us.

    I get furious just thinking about the comedy of strategic errors we have made that exacerbated this mess and sustained Russian hope even after their armed forces were humiliated in the field. Again, I say, inexcusable.

    Maybe Trump makes this worse, and maybe he doesn’t. Time will tell. But nothing he does or fails to do will excuse the role Sullivan (with Biden’s quiet acquiescence) played in failing to strangle Russian aggression in its crib.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,953
    2,108
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    You have me morbidly curious, Bill, how our indigenous industry that generates arms for our military is a “globalist organization.”
     
  19. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,826
    867
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Some of these people have been so programmed they just drop talking points and commonly used propaganda terms, even where it makes no sense or is devoid of meaning or context.

    Could have just as easily garbled out “the entire defense industry is woke CRT communism!” and it would make just about as much sense. Good luck trying to make sense of it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  20. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,779
    813
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    Good points. In my opinion, we (Obama, Trump, Biden) and our allies should have supported Ukraine more aggressively before the war began. It would have been cost-effective and beneficial for everyone involved. As the war progressed, delays in approving advanced weapons like HiMARS, F-16s, and ATACMS, as well as providing more equipment, were costly—especially during the failed 2023 fall offensive. This, combined with an eight-month halt in weapon supplies due to MAGA holding up the funding bill in the House, had devastating consequences, including the loss of many of Ukraine’s top soldiers.

    However, at the very start of the war, most people expected Russia to overwhelm Ukraine. I can understand the initial hesitation to send advanced systems, given the risk of them being captured and also not enough time to get there. Vs plan loads of MANPADS, etc.

    But as you say, hindsight is 20/20. Looking back at the early posts in this thread is fascinating in light of how things have unfolded.

    Going forward, I anticipate Ukraine may be willing to negotiate a deal that doesn’t require restoring 100% of its original borders. Let’s see what kind of poker players/deal makers the key leaders are. Btw a peace agreement will have a lot of complications- but for another post.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2024 at 1:05 PM