Ridiculous. But I do blame Biden for not announcing last year he wouldn't run so the dems could have an open primary. They had to deal with what they had and the timeline. Too little too late. Men would rather have a man as a candidate, that is a fact. I think we are way overdue, regardless of party. Did you see Nick Fuentes tiktok video? "Your body my choice"? Disgusting.
You are using a loser (Fuentes) as your example for men? I also said yesterday that Haley and Hillary were more experienced and prepared. How are they not? I listed Gore and Pence here because you said "VP's" And by again saying she is far and above other VPs ignores GHWB in '88. Its silly.
Trump wasnt running against Kamala in 2016. That is the issue i keep addressing. This weird inflation of Kamala's experience.
Here’s the thing If Kamala is such a wonderful candidate.. with so much experience and is the most qualified candidate.. why did so many DEMOCRATS refuse to vote for her. It wasn’t Republicans that sat at home ( well some did as Trump got fewer votes this time around…) Are all those DEMOCRATS misogynistic? Racists? Or was Kamala a terrible ca did ate with terrible messaging? Hmmm
No. Democrats that supported white dudes over her are not racists or misogynists. Only Conservatives that do the exact same thing can be called that.
I agreed with you after that post that HW was more qualified. As far as being more prepared, again, I blame Biden for not fulfilling his promise to be a "transitional president" and not running giving the dems time to have an open primary. She literally had a 107 day campaign. Fuentes has started a campaign if you will of t-shirts and even kids in HS saying that to girls faces. When you disenfranchise women, you create this environment.
I would agree that based on his previous term Trump was more qualified than Harris. On the other hand based on experience she was more qualified than Obama when he ran in 2008. He served less than two years as a US Senator and a couple of terms as a state senator.
Nobody expects righties to complain after they won. It's another transparent piece of evidence that election denialism was a ruse.
So, I've read on this board that Harris was the 2024 dem candidate only because Joe Biden unexpectedly endorsed Harris after his "decision" to drop out of the race against Trump. Apparently, the dem cabal elites wanted someone else .... well at least an open primary if it wasn't too late for that. I'm skeptical of any claims that Harris was a qualified or good candidate. In fact, given her public appearances after being appointed the dem potus candidate ...... she's not qualified for anything beyond a California state post.
Isn't there someone in here tracking the members who do not post, just go around giving negative ratings?
Usually you just do multiple and consistent drive-by neggings of people, but I gotta give it to you. When you DO post, the wit and perspicacity really shines through. This is a brilliant post that exudes insight, intellect, and thought. Top notch, sir!
Great and very deep post. I can tell you're a pro Oh, and so since you add absolutely nothing to the board, you're joining Bluke and Plank in the D Dungeon
You understand that no one expected Trump to complain about election fraud if he won, right? That's the whole point of this thread. There's only fraud if if Trump loses.
This. It's just kind of fun to point out that Trump tells lies about fake election fraud every time he loses.....or thinks he might lose (see PA this year.) It's even more fun to point out that so many Americans don't really have a problem with this un-American conduct. Astounding, really.
The only fraud in this election seems to be where did the over $1B raised by Harris go? And despite raising all that money, is it true the campaign is somehow still in debt?
