Wow. Hurling baseless insults as evidence won't get you accepted into any debate club. Call Kellyanne Conway, you can join her "alternative facts" club.
I would say over the past decade he has a little political background. As for bankruptcies, yeah Trump has filed for 4 chapter 11 business bankruptcies as have many American businessmen like Henry Ford, Walt Disney to mention a few. Trump never filed for personal bankruptcy like Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S Grant or a couple other US Presidents. I guess by your standards Abe Lincoln was not a qualified President and Henry Ford was a bad businessman.
“is a similar quote of Richard Marx” dang, what song is this? Right here waiting for you? Man, I missed this back in 1989.
Other than Willie Brown (as you repetitiously mention), what other older, powerful men has she dated? Harris has been an elected official since 2003, chosen by voters, not chosen by appointment. Your comments are just plain silly.
Subliminal lyrics in these Richard Marx songs perhaps: Dance With My Father (with Luther Vandross), or This I Promise You (NSync).
The point is not lost, no matter how much you attempt to whitewash it. She's a Marxist. Of the Karl variety.
How is it silly that Kamala Harris was dating Willie Brown, the Democrat power broker? He moved her up into a higher position. This happened. You may think it’s silly but most people would disagree. It’s sick.
Just gives so much more meaning to when people call her a Marxist. This whole time they were upset of her and Dougie swaying to the ballads.
Less sick than the appx 25 women who have accused the serial adulterer and adjudicated sexual assaulter, Donald Trump, of sexual assault? I think not.
CCH, I am not that poster and I didn’t read the whole thing, but the preface says that the analysis is from a Marxist viewpoint.
She is no ordinary citizen. She is a candidate for president of the United States. That proposition is an important political issue for which she refuses to give her opinion.
It does not actually. The viewpoint is largely a mixture of perspectives. Neo-Keynesian, neoclassical, and Marxian approaches are discussed in the book and integrated based on his theories. Direct quote from the Preface: That is the closest it gets to that claim. It should be noted that while both Marxian economics and Marxism arise from the same source, they are not the same thing. Marxian economics - Wikipedia I believe that Harris is generally as "Post-Keynesian" rather than Marxian himself.
