But those only. Because if they also have microphones, Donald Trump will come over and try to orally bring them to orgasm.
You are "opinions unsupported by fact" royalty! Do you think shying away from tough interviews disqualifies one from the presidency?
You must be referring to her recent interview on the hostile Fox "News"? Meanwhile your convicted felon hasn't done any tough interviews lately, he's only been fellating microphones. Now can you please come back with actual facts? Thanks!
Not by itself but, when you recognize why she's avoiding tough questions, you have to wonder. There is no way you've listened to her talk and thought "she's pretty intelligent". I understand hating Trump but I don't understand actually thinking Kamala should be President.
That was pretty good. Especially the Trump bit. And her telling Joe he has done enough to support her.
The ol' red herring. Don't look at how lousy my candidate is.......look at how lousy the other one is.
It was a good spot for her — the not so subtle call out to looking in the mirror — was speaking to many young people. Hey, she even was good natured about all the complaints here about her laughing!
I agree that too often it's criticize the other rather than defend your own. But the reality is that it is a choice between two. You may vote for one because you like everything about him or her. Or maybe ... he's better than the other one. Don't you think a good percentage of presidential votes are against one candidate, rather than for one?
Or she could be like Trump and take the tough questions and then whine like a baby that it was a nasty question from a nasty person. And you don't think she is smart enough, yet you will vote for Trump who is clearly a moron. The stuff he says is not just wrong most of the time, it is flat out embarrassing.
Trump on a 60 minutes interview, "Nyet" Trump on a second debate, "Nyet" Trump on an interview on the View, "Nyet" etc. etc. etc.