The Party of Life does it again

This is not about the Texas Law. This is about bad medical care from what we know. No way a hospital/doctor should have discharged a 6 month pregnant woman with sepsis. And the Texas law on abortion has nothing to do with that.

Sadly this will be another attempt by those that want to kill the most innocent for convenience to twist reality to push their agenda of killing for convenience.

 

Q clearly missed the part where her treatment was delayed by doctors investigating the viability of the fetus….

This is going to keep happening until every state passes an amendment like Florida is hopefully going to pass… and free women and doctors to make their own medical decisions the way it used to be ….

 

Not pro life, pro control. All about power and control.

 

SHIT HOLE COUNTRY

 

I eyerolled so hard at this that I almost passed out

 

The baby had a heartbeat. By law, doctors couldn't stop the sepsis until there was no more heartbeat. It's about the Texas Law.

 

So this is a year old story and the young lady had already had a miscarriage of the fetus? This seems like or reads like horrible care by several hospitals

 

Sad if it implies what I think it implies.

 

No. I did not miss anything. You want to allow the killing of the innocent for convenience. And are willing to use situations that have nothing to do with the law to push that evil agenda.

 

Based on what we know. They sent her home with sepsis pregnant. This has nothing to do with the law. But I get you don’t care as long as we can kill the most innocent for convenience. We have discussed this issue many times and disagree and view life differently. I pray one day you actually will care for the most innocent!

 

Your reply is nonsensical.

The Crain case is not about her needing an abortion. It is about how Texas' passage of a strict abortion law has caused doctors and facilities to second guess what medical treatments can be legally offered to pregnant women to save the life of the mother.

Where is your compassion for this young woman, who clearly suffered greatly before dying? Was she not "innocent" (your word) as a human being and deserving to live?

 

They sent her home with sepsis because the fetus still had a heartbeat. And by law, the doctors couldn't treat the sepsis as long as the fetus had a heartbeat. The law prevented doctors from saving the woman's life.

Why don't you care about the life of the woman? Who was saved by her death?

 

I agree that the law is absolutely terrible but these doctors and hospitals need to stop being such pussies and actually start treating people when it is needed. Somebody's got to be brave

 

People are going to choose self preservation.

 

Most of the time

 

Agree!
Also we need more doctors and less lawyers.
The world would be a better place.

 

Another story

A pregnant teenager died after trying to get care in three visits to Texas emergency rooms

 

This is pure conjecture with no factual basis. Stop making stuff up in your head.

There is nothing in the law that prevented doctors from treating the mother if her life was in jeopardy.

 

The law is fine and good. Now your second point about doctors doing their job is spot on. Nothing in the law would confuse a doctor about treating sepsis.