Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Harris sitting down for Fox interview Wednesday

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Oct 14, 2024 at 1:08 PM.

  1. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,058
    14,310
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Lol!

    So....... why not seek the "follow the law" vs a vs illegal immigration and our borders?

    Why continue to disregard the SCOTUS wrt to (buying votes with) student loan forgiveness?

    Confiscating guns?

    Disallowing fracking?

    Seeking to (LOL!-->) "reinstate Roe v Wade"? :D:p:D

    ...

    More leftist projection.

    Can't win in democracy....

    ... appoint successor via committee of Party leaders, count illegal votes, deploy government agencies to prosecute poly adversaries AND manipulate public knowledge to promote a political party's agenda by running cover to bury inconvenient facts...

    Call the democratically *elected* opposition, a threat to democracy...

    The law is inconvenient?

    Disregard it... declare yourself all "rule of law"... point at your opponent and talk about he's a threat to rule of law...

    Almost funny...except we've see the movies and recognize the script they're playing from...

    ...and we know the stakes.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  2. vegasfox

    vegasfox GC Hall of Fame

    1,378
    97
    88
    Feb 4, 2024
    $750

     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  3. LimeyGator

    LimeyGator Official Brexit Reporter!

    To use a poker parlance, it feels like everyone on this board is 'pot-committed' at this point, left and right.
    Everyone appears to have made up their minds (I think? Is anyone undecided?).
    Being honest, the rest just seems like filling time and chucking mud for the sake of it. It's why - even though I hate the carnival and posturing of it all, I'm glad the UK only really has about 6-8 weeks of this. You guys dig in early with your electoral process, eh?! :D
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    6,932
    1,046
    2,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    That’s unbelievable . You mean to tell me more people watched an interview at 6pm than an interview at 11am.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  5. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Legend

    784
    145
    163
    Aug 9, 2024
    It's sad that you believe this.

    But then again, some of us you are very comfortable with Trump's racism, criminality, adultery and rape. Enjoy.
     
  6. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,836
    834
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    It’s not complicated.

    Joe Biden was not removed from the campaign because he’s senile. He was removed because his senility significantly harmed his re-election efforts. How do we know this and how do we know Democrats don’t care about his senility? He’s been in significant mental decline for years at this point, he’s still President of the United States, and Kamala Harris has the means to remove him from office via the 25th Amendment. She chooses not to.

    The case on Trump’s senility is not only untrue, but those allegations clearly aren’t harming his re-election efforts based on the current polling. There’s a reason Kamala’s going on Fox News and talking about going on Joe Rogan (after nothing but hiding from any hostile environment since entering the race), while Trump is just having fun on the campaign trail. We may not have a crystal ball, but it looks like one side is campaigning like they’re losing, and one is campaigning like they’re winning.

    Democrats want their allegations on Trump’s senility to stick so they can harm the current frontrunner in the election (and they’ve already tried everything else). But tough to make the case that you actually care about that when Joe Biden is the current President, the Democrat nominee has the means of removing him, and chooses not to.
     
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2024 at 7:17 AM
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,836
    834
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Then why is Kamala Harris running as a “change” candidate, “turning the page,” distancing herself from Joe Biden, while Trump is running on his record as President?

    It looks like not even the Harris campaign believes you. Or they’re just really bad at this.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    10,830
    2,441
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    With 90 days of campaigning Harris is slightly leading Trump in the polls.. you know.. the guy who has been campaigning for 4 years. Harris has run a well crafted campaign regardless of duration. Her message is resonating. Her message is "we are not going back". "Change" was Obama - you didnt like that either.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,836
    834
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    1) She is not leading Trump in the polls.
    2) Neither Kamala nor her campaign are acting like they are leading Trump in the polls.
     
  10. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    10,830
    2,441
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    She may lose electorally due to not having the exact spread of support but she is leading all the national polls with 90 days of campaigning. Her campaign has been nearly flawless. The outcome wont be decided because she had a bad strategy.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Legend

    784
    145
    163
    Aug 9, 2024
    Come on, man. Get that nonsense out of here.

    Trump is running on racial grievance, amped up. Basically just what he' always run on; "stuff is not fair, and they're giving everything to illegal immigrants. Who are really really hurting you!"

    Disagree?

    "They're eating the dogs."
    "FEMA gave all the money to illegal immigrants. (them)"
    "They're releasing all the criminals from jails and asylums."

    Also note : "They aren't like you. Hint hint"
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    6,932
    1,046
    2,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    So you’re acknowledging that she may lose in the only count that counts?
     
  13. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,836
    834
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Losing “electorally” is losing buddy.
     
  14. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,836
    834
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Then why is Trump outperforming every Republican Presidential candidate among Blacks since Nixon, and Hispanics in 20 years?

    The American people are not buying the “Orange Hitler” routine.
     
  15. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    6,692
    2,490
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    I read this site regularly (and I’m not proud of that). And while you do preface your posts by saying you’re not an of Trump, you spend the vast majority of your ink attacking Biden and now Kamala. It’s not even close. And, while you clearly are not a Trumpeteer, I don’t recall you ever attacking Trump’s cognitive decline.

    Just to bring us current, the issue of the day is not whether Trump is more degraded than Biden. Biden is thankfully not running. The issue is whether Trump is mentally degrading—does he have the long-term mental acuity to lead our Country and its treasure? I think the answer is no (although, at the expense of repetition, it is highly conceivable that I am not objective on that point).
     
  16. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    6,692
    2,490
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    Yeah. But now we have to defend against cats and dogs. Things are bad,man!!!
     
  17. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,836
    834
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Well fortunately for Trump (assuming your point is even true, which I don’t think it is), Democrats have set the standard that he doesn’t need to be “there” for the next 4 years, he only needs to be “perceived” as “there” on Election Day.
     
  18. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,836
    834
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    If Trump’s mental capacity is Democrats’ last attempt to swing over the undecideds, good luck getting that dog to hunt.

    At least that’s some sort of tacit acknowledgement that the “Orange Hitler” routine isn’t working.
     
  19. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    6,692
    2,490
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    Let’s agree for argument that Biden was replaced because people watched the debate and saw he was unelectable. So what. He was replaced.

    As for your next 2 paragraphs, I appreciate you are an active Trump supporter, not one of the majority of his voters that apologize and excuse away their embarrassing vote for him. However, have you actually listened to his rambling at his speeches, or his 15 minute answers to questions not even asked at his interviews?

    Forgetting whether I agree or disagree with his policies (or I should say his plan to come up with a policy), I hear total gibberish. Literal gibberish. His advisors have told him it’s such gibberish that he now has an explanation for his gibberish—the “strategic” weave.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    6,692
    2,490
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    So then you’re not voting FOR Trump, you’re voting for Vance—the guy who told the world, many times that Trump is incompetent, a danger to the world, and the literal equivalent of Hitler.

    Cool.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1