Report: Harris Plagiarized Large Sections of 2007 Congressional Testimony

It’s amazing…

All they had to say is: “she shouldn’t have done that, but it’s not disqualifying for me,” but they can’t even do that.

 

You just plagiarized ...

"Sounds like"
"LOL"
"NYT's (sic) said"

... from past posts I've made. I say those things all the time.

 

Once again there is a difference between failing to properly attribute very minor passages and passing the original work of another writer as one's own. Apparently you cannot comprehend the distinction.

 

I dont think the people who publish politicians campaign PR books are using Turnitin dude, its not a term paper or monograph lol

 

Am I writing a paper? Because what you said is ridiculous. Lay off the drugs this early in the day.

 

Very minor LOL. Love it! You on the payroll for Harris? If not you should be.

 

It is very common to have thoughts in a paper that came from elsewhere and didn't get noted.

As to your own papers--if the professor had read them for any reason--you could be cited for plagiarism in a strict academic institution.

 

I'm just having a laugh at the guy behind this, and you for being so invested in what he says, for claiming things like the word "but" -- yes, just the single instance of the word "but" in a sentence -- as being plagiarized.

 

I often wonder what color the sky is in your world.

 

You know how you guys don't care about:

26 women who have come forward to accuse trumph of sexual assault
Being adjudicated of sexual assault
The attempt to overthrow a fair and free election
Inciting a riot on the capital
34 felonies
Stealing classified files and hiding them from the government
Katie Johnson
Project 2025 and Agenda 47
Bragging on tape about sexually assaulting women
40 of his 44 cabinet not endorsing him
Longtime republicans endorsing his dem opponent
He won't release his medical records
He wont' debate anymore
He's canceling interviews
And more:
The Life & Crimes of Donald Trump - TrumpFile.org

We don't care about the constant posting by you with lame stories that are supposed to be your hopeful "October surprise".

Sorry, not sorry.

 

He's been indicted on several of the illegal actions I listed. The rest are just facts. I provided a link to more. But just move along, nothing to see here.

 

Not on the payroll of Harris just paraphrasing the words of an expert on the subject of plagiarism who is more knowledgeable than either one of us and once again trying to pass the work of another as one's own is a form of plagiarism the would constitute both legal and academic fraud. Not so with the inadvertent omission of attribution of minor passages in a large work.
For the third time:

 

Quick question, what are this "expert's" political leanings? I'm gonna take a wild guess and say the person is a Dem.

 

He was convicted of 34 felonies and is indicted on the other law breaking acts listed. Last I checked, a felony is a criminal act. Better?

 

As usual, Harris is D ifferent.