Believe all women

Sorry- you rabidly support a man who was adjudicated guilty of sexual assault, and admitted he does so. In fact, you think he should be President of the United States.

So get back to us with your concerns about sexual assaulters when you don't support one, please.

 

BELIEVE ALL WOMEN*

*45% of the time.

 

So the scarecrow’s husband hit his ex and impregnated the family’s nanny? This guy is a loser … and a good fit for Willy Brown’s mistress.

 

Candidate one has spouse where someone alleged sexual assault. Candidate two is himself an adjudicated rapist.

Same thing?

 

Do you believe the many women who've accused Trump of assaulting them?

 

You support and want to see an admitted and adjudicated sexual assaulter elected president of the United States.

When you no longer support such a vile, deplorable criminal, your opinions on issues of morality will contain some value.

What, you expected it would, and should, be different than that? That expectation would be totally weird.

 

They have done far more stories on the Candidate himself - there’s plenty there. Only thing i’ve heard about his spouse is the Girl Scouts were successful in their lawsuit over her embezzlement of $3,000 - if there are other items I haven’t paid attention as she is not potentially the next governor of the state where i live.

My concerns about a candidate’s integrity and honor are primary in my voting decisions but they extend no further than the candidate (almost always).

 

I will not vote fore either Doug Emhoff nor Donald Trump. Problem solved.

 

..

 

I just checked my ballot and didn't see the name Emhoff. OP am I missing something?

 

I didn't want to be the one to say it but...

I will say that without reading the source or looking into this allegation, lets say its true.. Kamala needs to tread a little carefully. Although, with Trump being the alternative, not sure how much it matters.

 

The day i agree with you is the day I have any concern about my mental acumen or judgement or morals or....

You are trying to equate an adjudicated sexual assault with an allegation of a slap that supposedly took place in France 12 years ago? And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.

 

Cool. Then don't read the NYT if it upsets you. And I won't read 'mainewire.com'.

 

Missed when you were complaining so bitterly about how Fox never gives Trump any bad press.

In fact, in the past he met with their executives to discuss and plan their reporting of the "news."

Missed where you were really upset about that. So you'll understand if that factors into your credibility when claiming to be a victim of the press.

 

The rape vote gonna be tight.