Since nobody else will answer, the answer is that, other than the natural lifespan of a human, no, we don't know when they arrived. To provide more information, this also includes many people currently incarcerated for their crimes (especially when you get to crimes like murder or rape that are accompanied by long prison sentences). Since they aren't in ICE custody while in a local jail or a state or federal prison, they are included on this list. Funny note: the list actually grew at a faster pace under Trump than under Biden. https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/29/politics/fact-check-trump-harris-immigrants-homicide/index.html
Using a slur like this against a group of people is akin to racism and based in bigotry, ignorance and hate. But then everyone knows this about you. I hope you find a way to forgive whoever hurt you. Bitter and hate-filled is no way to go through life. And I'm not going to listen to your toxic vomit anymore.
Since when is it bad form to make fun of backwards ass Alabama on a UF based website? I swear you righties would align with FSU if a liberal said something bad about it. Just weird.
This might shed some light on your question. Although, tbh, I am not sure if this is just another example of Trump flagrantly lying, or the OP lying or presenting deceptive statistics. In any case, as we see repeatedly; Trump is a vile liar who insults every citizen of this country by presenting such a constant stream of offensive lies. Fact check: To attack Harris, Trump falsely describes new stats on immigrants and homicide Former President Donald Trump is wildly distorting new statistics on immigration and crime to attack Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump falsely claimed Friday and Saturday that the statistics are specifically about criminal offenders who entered the US during the Biden-Harris administration; in reality, the figures are about offenders who entered the US over multiple decades, including during the Trump administration. And Trump falsely claimed that the statistics are specifically about people who are now living freely in the US; the figures actually include people who are currently in jails and prisons serving criminal sentences. https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/29/politics/fact-check-trump-harris-immigrants-homicide/index.html
I disagree that calling Alabama fans inbreds is racist. Is "inbred" a race? A protected class? In any case, if it were racist - wouldn't that make you more supportive of the comment, as you are very supportive of Donald Trump's constant stream of public and damaging racist lies? Your actions and tolerances indicate that you approve of racism. Or are you just totally and completely silent about racism until your feelings are hurt, and then you choose to play the victim? Would you not consider that just a bit lot, umm, hypocritical?
But it can tilt the election to Trump according to the original poster. The reality is that the low-information willfully ignorant voters who may be triggered by the data and the distorted way that it's been presented are already strongly predisposed to vote for the former president. I seriously doubt that it will affect very many swing voters.
Absolutely correct!!! Trump did NOTHING when he had full power to do so. He was either incompetent or he had no interest in securing the border, knowing that it's his #1 campaign issue and crucial to his ability to stir up anger, hatred and violence in his base.
Trump has LIED constantly about migrant crime. The crime rates for migrants are far lower than those for U.S. citizens. This is straight out of the authoritarian playbook: use dehumanizing language like they are "animals who infest" their community and they are "poisoning the blood" of Americans. Then, to support his easily disproven LIES about them being prone to violence, he finds a few ugly cases where a migrant did something horrible, meets with the victims, and says: "See!!! I told you they were murderers and rapists!!!" It's just another Trump con job. Unfortunately, millions believe his BS.
Not so. Biden was prepared to sign the recent bi-partisan border security bill, which was crafted by hard-line Republicans and supported by the Border Patrol and the Wall Street Journal. Many of those hard-line Republicans were upset that Trump torpedoed the bill. I provided examples above.
Oh come on. The Dem have had ample time to make this a priority when they held the House, Senate, and President just like the Republicans.
Agree. It's hard to say that either side has aggressively pushed the issue, or proposed a major reform plan. But at least one side hasn't resorted to scare-mongering for votes through a campaign of repeatedly telling dangerous racist lies.
Since 1995, the Democrats have only controlled the House, Senate and Presidency for a single 2-year period (2009-2010) and during that period the economy was a much higher priority than immigration reform.