You don't get to just say this so many times that it becomes true. The only place you and yours are victims is in your own victimy minds. Although your political hero lies so much that it does make sense he'd be more comfortable among other admitted liars. But here's the thing: if you don't want your candidate to be fact checked.....then don't support a racist, rapist, twice impeached, convicted felon, dog eating liar.
Isn't it a good idea to do some factchecking during the debate? I don't think the moderators traditionally have. And obviously it's going to be impossible to factcheck each candidate exact number of times. But Trump's history is too spew a lot of falsehoods. (I can't call them lies because I don't know if he knows they're false or not.) For example, when he claims that babies are being killed after they're born ... shouldn't that be corrected?
So tiring, independent fact checkers found Trump lied on more 30 occasions during the debate and was called out on the most egregious, a balancing act for the moderators. https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/10/politics/fact-check-debate-trump-harris/index.html Easier for him to attack the press and moderators than acknowledge to what we all witnessed on the debate stage: Harris exposed him as weak, ill-prepared and tired during her strong performance.
He's been complaining about being a victim since the day he first announced he was running nine years ago. Actually, it dates well before that. Why didn't 'The Apprentice' win an Emmy? It was rigged against him, of course.
I have never seen anyone, not even a 5 year old, less willing to own their failures than Trump. He was unprepared. He was uninformed. He was unhinged. He was uninspiring. And like a 5 year old, he is pretending he won and blaming others for his failure. So bizarre.
Actually, I was hoping he'd be a bit worse and claim that schools were performing sex-change operations on kids who didn't know what was going on. Or maybe that Harris changed the laws in California so that robbing a store of less that $950 is not a crime. He could have done so much better.
LMAO! "Independent fact checkers"--like the one who conveniently only dared to concede ONE Itty bitty white lie by her highness, the flirty, hair flitting, nasally voiced sorority chick cheerleader sKamala... The perfect (*cough* Manchurian *cough*) candidate!
Go ahead and list out Kamala’s lies then. The ball is in your court. Surely a fair and balanced news organization would put them side by side, and presumably in your world show us Trump is a truth seer - that it’s really Harris that is the unconscious pathological liar. Go ahead. Show us those whoppers. Let us know which ones compare to “I really won the election“, “I have the biggest crowds, Kamala’s crowds are fake”, “They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the pets” and “they are executing babies after birth”.
Bookmarked. In a week I will check in with you and see if we are there or are in a place where you have moved on to embrace the latest hare-brained conspiracy. I like my odds. Also. Is there anything lower than quoting Duggars quoting Nick Fuentes the Russophile quoting the white nationalist?
Whapn'n City? Lost your sense of humor? Thought you were swole with confidence after your head Doh! Biden cheerleader wiped the floor with Orange man? Lol! Guess maybe not so much, huh?
I hear there’s a new documentary incoming on these missing pets. It’s called “2000 cats”. A well grounded naturally inquisitive fellow like 92 would never fail for such a thing.
She said she’s looking forward to bringing the nation together. Bald faced lie. She’ll tear it apart.
Btw, to your last point which I missed--idk who Nick Freitas is, but I'm pretty sure he's not Nick Fuentes. But that's admittedly conjecture on my part. Could be a typo in the Twitter account...
Trump lost the debate by 25+ points and everyone is blaming the referees? Sorry, but a loss that big is on the participant, not the moderators. But Trump cult members find him infallible and never hold him accountable.
The count was 5 to 0. Frankly, I'm having second thoughts and thinking the GOP should continue taking debates with the MSM, because the people see that the Dem candidate needs a "handicap" to look good. That is why none of these debates seem to translate for the candidate in the voting booth. Biden was +9 in the polls, supposedly crushed Trump in their first debate, Trump skips the second debate out of frustration and still comes within 100,000~ votes of winning the election. Kamala is a much weaker candidate than Hillary or Biden (the 2020 version), so of course, she's asking for another debate, because this one didn't end Trump's candidacy. I'm on the fence now as to whether or not he should take it.
