Can't say the debate was a total loss. Many people saw the unvarnished truth they conceivably could have been lacking that Trump is a completely unhinged clown. "THEY'RE EATING THE DOGS!! THEY'RE EATING THE CATS!!"
No, Kamala. I am proposing that the GOP effectively end their participation at the presidential level until the system is broken down and rebuilt with standards. (ie moderators not fact checking based on personal interpretation, for example) Which is why unless Trump can get her to agree to a debate on Fox, he's not going to take another debate with her. I don't blame him. She wants to debate again, supposedly. Likely because she knows it's her only chance of winning.
So you are upset that Trump was fact checked by a moderator for claiming immigrants are eating pets? Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps the moderators aren’t the problem?
I’m not buying that it isn’t true. How do 15,000 “legal” Haitians end up in a town of 58,000 people in the middle of Ohio anyway? But they didn’t bring any of their customs though. Amirite? Just another right-wing conspiracy I guess. 15,000 immigrants of one descent in a town of 58,000. Happens all the time, I’m sure.
Trafalgar is one.of the 2 most accurate polls imo They had Trump up 0.6% in tje.popular vote before the debate and 0.3% after the.debate. It was 3 against 1 on the stage but ztrump still won. He missed several.opportunities but did enough.
Not important to do one on Fox. Important to NOT do another, UNLESS it's Fox. Why subject himself to another gang up ambush hack job, with fluff questions to the sorority cheerleader chick, while he's subjected to cross examination? (then they go and pretend she won, when all she did was sit and look pretty, while the adults in the room talked policy, politics, and grown up sruff?) Yeah...nah... I'm sure Trump has better use of his time working the campaign trail, than patronizing another MSN circus.
It would be interesting to see if Fox would. From the standpoint of the dems, they should debate on Fox and if Fox treats Kam the way ABC treated Donald, it could possibly, likely help Kam. The dems could point out how “mean and unfair” Fox was to a “woman” (if the term can de defined snd Kam can be characterized as such) of Afro-Asian heritage.
Fox's version of fact checking.. Kamala: I will be the president for everyone. Fox: That is a lie you commie, dog eating groomer!
With those obvious left wing radical extremists et ABC (isn’t that how that came off?). It’s just not fair unless respected right wing individuals and consummate professionals like Jack Pocebiac and Sean Hannity get to moderate a debate. Then we might finally get to find out why Kamala approves of dog harvesting or find out how many men she’s slept with. Without fair and balanced questioning we might never get to the bottom of what exactly Skamala was doing on 1/6. What was her alibi? Huh? These are questions and the people need answers.
Hannity hosted a debate with Gavin Newsome and RonnyD. It was very fair and balanced (even GN said so), illicited useful information, and allowed both participants plenty of opportunity to showcase their strengths and answer for their weaknesses. So I'm guessing not. But at least Trump could expect a fair shake.
Fyi--ABC didn't do sKamala any favors by covering for her. They betrayed that she needed the cover. = not very presidential.
