But that's not the rub. The rub is that Muir attempted to debunk the claim wholesale with a false real-time fact check. Not only was it bad form to fact check only one candidate, but Muir's information was wrong.
A proposed solution would have been nice, instead of the pure, unsubstantiated rhetoric of “I will resolve it on one day.” How? Give us a clue.
This is a profoundly dumb post. You're expecting Trump to divulge his peace proposal 4 months ahead of time so that Putin and Zelenskyy can jockey to strengthen their bargaining power in the meantime? That's a great way to ensure peace will never happen. As @Bazza said, it was a gotcha question, because no state leader is publishing his/her peace plan for something like this 4 months ahead of time.
Bad form on ABC, agreed, but that clip seems to be more mental health related than immigrant related, especially if the cops were checking her teeth for blood. The vid seems to imply she was eating a cat that was freshly killed ( I only took a cursory look at the vid).
The answer is that we have 68 million illegal immigrants, the numbers are worse, the FBI is lying about them, we will need to eat cat food paid for by the Biden student loan money.
Yes. I would absolutely expect a guy who is renowned for making things up,to support his claim that he can resolve the war in one day. In fact, I’d add that what is “profoundly stupid” is someone who believes that Trump has the singular capacity to end the war. It is nonsensical for him to say it,and itis even worse for someone to believe him.
They are not equally lacking. Any attempt to equate someone who's policies you are unsure of vs a lunatic screaming about dogs and cats with a history of pissing on the constitution is insane. I dont really know your posts that well but you seem somewhat coherent which should make for an easy choice. But its a free country.
O also think it is because his deranged answers were so eye-rolling that there was nothing really to discuss.
She didn't have to answer that... the answer is immigration of course. Is poster actually implying that states allow Trump's after birth abortion? Is poster unaware that only about 1% of abortions occus after the 24th week and almost all of those are to save the mother's life or are because of discovery of lethal fetal abnormality. BTW we all missed Trump's answer on any regret from Jan. 6th. All I caught was a debunked lie (not fact-checked !) about Nancy and the DC mayor.
It COULD HAVE been a kill-shot theme. But he wasted the entire debate talking about idiotic nonsense, like crowd size and cat-killers, along with made-up stats. Instead of leading and weaving this theme into every answer, he just looked like an unhinged old man.
Better hope he doesn’t get replaced at this point. I still think someone like Haley would easily win.
I agree. I remember thinking this is going to be a long night. And then Trump reminded us he is Trump and that he stands for nothing other than Trump. When Fox says Harris easily win the debate, it might mean Harris easily won the debate.
I heard that Trumps campaign will only agree to another debate if Trump's mic is also turned off while he is speaking.
It could’ve been a strong theme forTrump in the debate,right? But cats, Victor Orban and the lying FBI …
The MAGAts would riot. She would lose in spectacular fashion because the cult would stay home out of spite. Now if Haley had been the nominee all along I agree she would destroy any dem just because of inflation. It takes a special kind of moron to lose this election for the GOP.
