Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

August payrolls grew by a less-than-expected 142,000

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by okeechobee, Sep 6, 2024.

  1. ETGator1

    ETGator1 GC Hall of Fame

    16,014
    1,858
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    You have said this before. I say prove that I have said this.

    I'm the one saying we aren't headed into a recession or depression and the numbers don't support those who say the US economy is headed that way and calling for premature rate cuts.

    Just because the numbers should be better is your issue to deal with. You get what you vote for. Win again in November and it could be irreversibly damaging to the US economy, the American people, and the world economy.
     
  2. ETGator1

    ETGator1 GC Hall of Fame

    16,014
    1,858
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Agree, but at what risk to inflation?
     
  3. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    What inflation?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. ThePlayer

    ThePlayer VIP Member

    38,447
    5,209
    2,193
    Apr 3, 2007
    What can't be denied is that we have a slowing economy and one Presidential candidate (Harris) wants to raise taxes and another wants to cut them (Trump).
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Link?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  6. ETGator1

    ETGator1 GC Hall of Fame

    16,014
    1,858
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    The inflation we have now which is too much, and the risk that lowering rates will spur inflationary growth again before the soft landing has been achieved.

    As stated on page 1, none of the indexes to date have signaled the need for rate cuts yet. The trend line should be demonstrated that the inflation is in a pattern to fall to and below the Feds 2.0% target. This will not happen with a September rate cut.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Yep.. after announcing 818,000 less than reported over the past year (which didn't include June or July 2024). We're told what they want us to hear and then they sweep it under the rug later when less people are paying attention.
     
  8. G8R92

    G8R92 GC Hall of Fame

    3,306
    378
    378
    Feb 5, 2010
    "If we can focus on the big picture and not necessarily what some guy in his basement is saying in rural central Florida on social media, then we got a chance for a soft landing"

    Sincerely,

    Jerome Powell
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  9. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,257
    2,098
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Trump is proposing a 10% tariff. You realize that a tariff is a type of tax, which raises the taxes on everybody who uses products, right? So why do you think he is planning to cut taxes?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
  10. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Yeah, this is not the report you want to hear if you're Harris heading into a debate with Trump in 4 days and it's not just a one month anomaly. Clearly job growth is sputtering. Trump will also point out she could initiate her economic proposals right now as VP. Biden is a lame duck and few people believe he's really in charge anyway.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,481
    1,794
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Apparently you are unaware of Trump's proposal to raise tariffs on all imported goods a tax increase that would affect virtually every household in the US and would have a much greater impact on a slowing economy than a would tax the wealthiest taxpayers who spend a very small percentage of their income on consumer goods.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,257
    2,098
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Perhaps we should compare jobs gained per month averages under Trump and Biden. Let me know when you work those out.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  13. G8R92

    G8R92 GC Hall of Fame

    3,306
    378
    378
    Feb 5, 2010
    You mean like when Thanos snapped his fingers?
     
  14. ThePlayer

    ThePlayer VIP Member

    38,447
    5,209
    2,193
    Apr 3, 2007
    Under the current law, Americans owe capital-gains taxes when an asset is sold, but not if they pass those assets on to someone else at the time of their death. That means someone who inherits assets from a deceased parent, for example, does not have to pay taxes on how much those assets appreciated since they were purchased. Instead, the person who inherits the assets has to pay taxes on the gains only from the time they were inherited — and only once they are sold.

    Ms. Harris has endorsed a plan to tax the gains on those assets at the original owner’s death, though several exemptions would apply, including when a surviving spouse inherits the assets.

    Ms. Harris would set the top marginal income rate at 39.6 percent, up from 37 percent. On top of that, she would also increase the rate on two parallel Medicare surtaxes to 5 percent from 3.8 percent for Americans making more than $400,000 and expand the income subject to one of them. Together, the Medicare and income proposals would create a top marginal rate as high as 44.6 percent.

    What We Know About Kamala Harris’s $5 Trillion Tax Plan So Far - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
     
  15. ThePlayer

    ThePlayer VIP Member

    38,447
    5,209
    2,193
    Apr 3, 2007
    • The Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, a Washington D.C.-based think tank, projected that the 10% and 60% tariffs would collectively lower average after-tax incomes of U.S. households by about $1,800. That’s 55% less than what Harris said.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,221
    1,159
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    You know lower after-tax income means paying an additional $1,800 in taxes. Or $150/month more in taxes.
     
  17. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    So some are trying to make a rukus over 140k plus new jobs? I have been told a recession has already started but we don’t know it yet.

    I hate to break it to people but going forward, long term, 100k-200k per month is probably steady state due to demographics and aging population and work force.
     
  18. ThePlayer

    ThePlayer VIP Member

    38,447
    5,209
    2,193
    Apr 3, 2007
    And the average family will save thousands when Trump extends his tax cuts while Harris and the Dems lets them expire.
    Further, we will start buying products from countries that don't manipulate their currency and try to destroy us like China.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  19. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    I actually agree with this for the most part, but that is not why we went from banging out 250,000+ jobs per month to what we've seen the past 3 months.

    (on edit: wait I guess we weren't really banging out 250,000+ jobs per month after all with the sharp revisions)
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2024
  20. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,257
    2,098
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    That is a lot more than the average household income would be affected by a change in high-end capital gains taxes.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1