Trump landslide now certain: How RFK Jr and Robert Barnes saved America

equivocation of a lie

 

Ah, yes, the betting markets. With user demographics of 80% male, and more than 50% between ages 25 and 44.
The analytics for gaming this horse race are what, exactly?
Not polling of potential or actual registered voters?

 

Thanks. I certainly try not to.
The thing is, there are going to be a lot of disagreements here. It's inevitable. Whether it's truly over policy or just team partisanship. But we can always try to be truthful and respectful. I think I do a good job of being truthful, I'm sure I'm not always as respectful as I should be.
You do a much better job than most of us there.

 

Don't sweat the criticism too much. Same poster called me partisan for the sake of being partisan, which really surprised me considering I've been very respectful to him over the years. Oh well, at least still I have my fellow libbie @Orange_and_Bluke in my corner.

 

Trump landslide now certain

 

Who did Robert Barnes predict would win in 2020? Guy is a completely partisan Trump fanboi.

 

Shh- he’s busy saving America

 

How much momentum will RFK Jr.'s endorsement give Trump?

 

From the Silver Bulletin…

 

I'm sure he predicted Trump would win and then claimed the election was stolen when he didn't win

 

538 really does some great break downs.

 

So if these 20 million aren't in the US, they don't have any effect on the environment?!? What a silly notion. There is only one planet. And unless these immigrants either live in the US or they die a quick death, there will be no global change in their environmental impact.

 

I've never heard this argument before, but.. it's truth.

 

fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me. no plan for 4 years & no plan now. just kool aid for the idiots.

 

Short version of this:

Ecofascism - Wikipedia

 

I guess I am an ecofacist.

 

Yes, if you assume immigrants don't exist until they enter the country and, thus, have no impact on the environment in their prior countries, that would make sense. If, however, you assume that they are indeed people who engaged in a variety of economic activities in their origin countries, immigration is then just the movement of people.

While the increase in standard of living likely leads to more resource consumption, there is also the fact that developed countries have focused on limiting those impacts more per capita than developing countries generally do, meaning that even that effect is questionable going forward. And that is before we get into the long-term possibility of an educated person coming up with environmentally beneficial innovations and the reduction of costs for activities that are environmentally beneficial.

 

"By uniting the populist left and.populist right Trump should win the popular vote by 4-5 million per Robett Barnes"

Are there any betting sites where one can get some action on that prediction?