I'm not upset and if you really don't get the point then it's not worth explaining. Only 1.5 million in property damage and most of the people killed were rioters. You're right, I'll be voting the amateur criminals. You'll be voting for the pros.
If you consider someone who was indicted for 88 felonies in four different jurisdictions, and so far convicted of 34 of them to be an "amateur".....then OK. But don't forget, you're also voting for the pro sexual assaulter, who was adjudicated guilty of sexual assault, and also admitted to being one. And has been accused of sexual assault by over 20 different women - wow, that's a lot! And if THAT'S not enough, you're voting for the pro adulterer, who's cheated on all three of his wives, including with porn stars!! You must be so proud.
Assuming, for the sake of discussion, that I accept those convictions as valid. He got caught. That's amateur hour. Democrats are the pros, they get away with it. Oh, wait, you probably think that the Democrats are actually clean. So Democrats are worried about sexual misconduct now, are they? Bill Clinton was over two decades ago and now we're supposed to believe that the Democrats of today are made of a totally diferent moral fiber? Whatever Trump has done, or not done, imo the Democrats are still worse morally. They're just much better at not getting caught/prosecuted.
LOL. You don't get to accept or not accept jury verdicts. Sorry random guy on the internet, but our legal system isn't dependent upon your opinions. Pro Tip : pay your speeding tickets, even if you don't accept them. Also, you are a total and complete criminal mastermind. The biggest total criminal in the history of the world. You're just so rilly rilly good at it that you always get away with it. Trump, with his 34 convictions, is just an amateur compared to you. Did I do that right? (won't bother with the rest. But enjoy voting for the convicted felon sexual assaulter.)
Are you really using Bill Clinton from 25 years ago to justify Trumps sexual assaults? Maga has aligned their moral compass to all thing trump. They are now the low road.
No way they blindly vote Dear Leader as their candidate in the primary. To maga’s credit they at least don’t tout family values anymore.
I apologize. I didn't realize I needed to state the obvious WRT to my acceptance. Where did I claim that I was the criminal mastermind? I went third party in 2016. I was still sitting on the fence in 2020. It was the Democrats who persuaded me to vote for Trump. I never trusted them before but I never realized how truly slimy they are until Trump became president.
Follow the discussion, please. Also, shouldn't you incarcerate yourself for being the best criminal ever? * *So good that you've never been caught. (I assume) Just like the Democrats you speak of.
"Constructive critical thinking" is a euphemism for: a. Dumb as shit b. Willfully ignorant c. Partisan suckerage d. All of the above
Speaking of Bill Clinton, back in 1998 when Clinton was the president Jerry Falwell (don't recall whether it was Junior or Senior) and Franklin Graham said that the personal moral behavior of the President mattered. Fast forward to 2015/2016 and both said that the personal conduct of the president or more specifically one presidential candidate didn't matter when they endorsed Donald Trump. They essentially said that the issue of candidate's behavior was between him and God. What Franklin Graham said about the private sins of Bill Clinton in 1998 Franklin Graham has become a parody of himself with blind support for Trump
Nah. It was and remains a stupid idea--a variety of "I know you are but what am I"? Cheesy and stupid.
One other related comment. If you're referring to Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky almost every Democratic commentator and politician condemned it. If you're referring to Clinton's history of adultery keep in mind that the Democratic Party never claimed to be the party of Christian morality and family values, not so with the party that Donald Trump currently represents.
So, if a high ranking member of the Democrat party has never been convicted of a crime and a random person on the internet(me) has also never been convicted of a crime, then we must be equally innocent or equally skilled at evading prosecution. Is that point you're attempting to make?
