Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

The Electoral College is Very Unpopular

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by mdgator05, Aug 30, 2024.

  1. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    8,721
    1,607
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    Modern EC campaigning is on the margins, and that means 7 states with incidental stops for convenience in between.

    Pop vote margins would include a whole bunch of tiny populations typically ignored.

    Hypothetically, this cycle, RFKJ could make a legit run never going to Philly, Atlanta, or Phoenix.

    Kamala and DJT will never even bother with LA or NY, let alone Bakersfield or Ithaca.

    Again, are there no R’s in Cali? Are there no D’s in Louisiana?
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2024
    • Winner Winner x 2
  2. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,483
    1,562
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes it’s the states, but the states won’t change it. Eg It would require the Republican legislature of Texas just giving away a bunch of EC votes to the democrats. Vice versa for California’s Democratic leadership. The states could sign on to a pact that only goes into effect once a bunch of states sign on, like that popular vote EC scheme, but that’s hard to imagine as well.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,486
    956
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    The parties would want any proportionality to be based on districts in order to keep relevance.

    Making it based on state vote totals makes the most sense, but politics.
     
  4. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    34,863
    1,672
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    So in the deep philosophical question of which is more important: the voting power of an individual versus the voting power of a state, most people down firmly on the side … that helps their party.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,244
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    So because 69% of the country thinks transgenders shouldn’t be in women’s sports, then it’s settled, right? What an asinine statement, but not surprised that you posted it. Keep up the great work Sport!

    More Say Birth Gender Should Dictate Sports Participation
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1
  6. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    6,853
    1,034
    2,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    They should just move to a system where people have to pass a test to be eligible to vote
     
  7. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,442
    1,966
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Do you really want me to post all of the times that you have tried to shut down arguments with a poll? Or can we both agree that you are being disingenuous here and that you just don't like the results of the poll?

    BTW, I never claimed that it was settled. You made that up. You claimed it was Ds that wanted it. I just pointed out that 57% of the public wants it, which is substantially more than the percentage of the public that are registered to the Democratic party.
     
  8. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,604
    742
    243
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    I think the problem is with the two parties and the interminable nominating process. I like this shortened Kamala thing. She didn’t run for two years. Other democracies do it. There must be a better way than this.
     
  9. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,244
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    electoral college has nothing to do with that. It’s that we as a country have nominated idiots 12 years running now. But you keep thinking the EC is unfair. Bunch of other far lefties agree with you.
     
  10. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,244
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    I just pointed out how ludicrous your comment was. Don’t get your panties into a bunch. Sorry I ruined your little argument. Better luck next time skippy.
     
  11. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,442
    1,966
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Sure. Parties don't take the electoral system into account and come up with candidates that are targeted at about 100k, mostly lower information, occasional voters in a few states because that is what decides elections. It just happens at random, or something. Also, the country doesn't nominate people.
     
  12. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,442
    1,966
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    There is your tell. Next time, try a better argument, and your argument won't be smashed back in your face. Enjoy your L for your collection, sport!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,324
    1,287
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    This is my biggest beef. The whole damn thing should take 6 months tops. People aren’t getting their news from the papers any more. It feels like half my adult life has been spent during a damn “campaign year”
     
  14. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,604
    742
    243
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    I would prefer 6 to 8 weeks. This 2 years is nonsense and trump has been campaigning since he lost the last election.
     
  15. ATLGATORFAN

    ATLGATORFAN Premium Member

    3,351
    871
    2,153
    Aug 10, 2015
    I stand by for every $10,000 in income taxes I pay I get an additional vote. Why not? If I’m contributing more to the ‘system’ than 90+% then I should have more of a say. Also takes cares of the evil billionaires that pay no income tax
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2024
  16. ATLGATORFAN

    ATLGATORFAN Premium Member

    3,351
    871
    2,153
    Aug 10, 2015
    Amusing to me that OP doesn’t see the irony in the establishment of a republic purposely takes into account avoidance of majority (Mob) rule for governance, so merely posting anything that says 50%+ is making the point of the establishment of the EC in the first place.
     
  17. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,442
    1,966
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    We are a Democratic Republic. The representatives are supposed to represent the interests and desires of the people that they...represent.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,442
    1,966
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    First, I will point out something many miss: the more wealth you own, the more the "system" benefits you by maintaining and protecting that wealth. Second, no, pay-to-play is not actually a unique or good idea.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,244
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    Thanks for acknowledging your ridiculous previous statement.
     
  20. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,244
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    LOL, just because you are upset that you made a dumb argument you don’t need to get all defensive. Next time you are thinking of posting something this ridiculous maybe think twice. I know you won’t but I’ll continue to laugh at you.