More Proof Nancy Pelosi Set Up President Trump for J6

If the Dems really thought they would not have fought tooth and nail to avoid having audits with signature verifications. Before the election even took place it was obvious that Covid was being used as the excuse to rig it Xi viewed Trump as an existential threat.. that explains why he released Covid according to geopolitical mastermind Greg Copley

 

If the Dems really thought what? That they just won the election? They did! They won and they knew they won. How on earth would conspiring to stage a fake insurrection help them at that point? Please use your brain.

 

Trump thinks you’re a basement dweller.

 

GOP standard policy for years now:

When a republican-created situation goes up in flames, look around for the nearest Democrat to blame it on. It makes no difference at all if it fails every test of logic and common sense.

 

I'm not nearly as bothered by the mud slung at Trump, as I am by the mass prosecution and incarceration of ordinary US citizens expressing dissent over an election they reasonably believed in earnest to have been stolen.

There were a small handful who were rightly prosecuted. Most however, were drug in to a grossly over broad net cast too far and too wide, for political purposes. Basically upending their First Amendment rights...

...and then, in order to contain that stank, their Fourth Amendment rights to due process were gutted.

And yall pretend *liberals* celebrate this national wiping of the ass with the constitution.

I remember when the liberals, were the types who fashioned themselves to be like Aticus Finch, to stand against mob rule.

Today's Left, IS the mob, and seeks to rule accordingly.

 

Interesting take that the violent mob is the victim of the woke mob.

My advice is that if you are going for a revolution you had better win. They didnt.

 

You recollection is rather bizarre considering that the best example of "the mob" were the J6 insurgents ginned up by the former president.

 

#moreprojection

 

Contain the riot, arrest the disobedient, restore order...

That's normal.

Hunt civil dissenters to the ends of the earth years later, lock em up, throw away the key, permit them no voice, no public access...

...is what ya'll would label "fascism", if it were done to...folks with whom ya'll sympathized, politically.

Kinda like when such sympathic folks burned down Minneapolis, took over Seattle, wreaked havoc on Chicago... [ etc/ "summer of love"]...

No one posted wanted pics, hunted rioters down, deprived them of constitutional rights...

 

The perfect example of spin in response to what is/was a very rational and unprovocative post.

No one - left/right/center - disputes that there was a group/handful of malfeasants who trespassed, committed destruction of public property, and otherwise disturbed the peace with threatened or actual violence on J6. Those individuals were quickly apprehended during the event and rightly charged with numerous offenses. Unsatisfied with that result, the narrative unleashed, repeated, and made sacrosanct by the Left was that Trump, MAGA, etc. attempted to overthrow (not "riot," but "overthrow" - smh) the government of the United States is what is so ridiculous and insulting. It took a very concerted and directed effort by many in the current Administration to conduct its "investigation" to identify after the fact many other persons who simply were present during the events - and then automatically label them as "insurrectionists" in order to magnify the import of J6. Understandably, the events of J6 captured the attention/fantasy much more than events (riots, looting, burning, beatings, etc.) preceding and subsequent that occurred across the country because J6 occurred in the Capitol and not the usual locations of riotous disruption. What is not understandable is why the relatively minimal, actual property destruction and bodily threat/injury of J6 has become the "revolution" or "insurrection" that overwhelms public outrage - real or contrived - in comparison to the massive property damage and actual bodily injuries resulting from the numerous and contemporaneous riots. Did either side win their "revolution"? Nope. But the "woke mob" certainly has no problem or compunction in determining the inflated guilt of one group while ignoring/dismissing the actual guilt of the other group. My advice is that if you're going to demonize nearly half this country based upon innuendo and exaggeration to claim moral superiority, you might do yourself a favor by first reflecting upon actual facts and context.

 

Is that your opinion after reading the DC indictment against Trump? Because it lays out the entire scheme to overturn the results of the election - which at least to me is equivalent to overthrowing the rightfully elected President.

 

BS!

 

Is that your opinion after reading the briefs, memos, and rulings in response to the indictment that has now been largely dismissed or debunked? Hey, any prosecutor can write an indictment to promote a favored "story" - eventually there is the matter of proof and legal analysis. So far, the indictment is batting well below the Mendoza line. Also, I'm curious - when did the Left/ACLU begin to believe that prosecutors were the fountains of truth? That's rhetorical, of course.

 

Aren’t prosecutors just law school graduates that barely passed “contracts” and are too slow to catch an ambulance?

 

If you can point me to any briefs or memos that have been successful refuting the facts I'd take a look. The only "success" that I've seen was the presidential immunity argument which only succeeding in eliminating some of the evidence but none of the four charges. A second grand jury then chose to indict him based on the same charges despite the narrowed evidence.

 

Tldr

They likely would have been shot as traitors if their complexion was darker for sure.

 

Get your own law license and/or access to the Court's docket. It's all actually there if you're genuinely interested in reviewing the facts/arguments. Or, you can just continue to believe the usual second hand summaries from MSM. May also want to consider how the bigger picture reflects upon the details - Smith's prosecution is dead in the water and not progressing, nor being touted by the big brass in Dem party during the election.

 

Response to "Tldr" I was considering before your edit that added the second sentence: Strange reply from the person whose tagline is "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Irony?

As to the edited/added second sentence - you finally got to racism as the answer to all things. What took you so long?

 

Excellent point about his sig.

 

Don't know why I expected anything other then the usual where someone makes a claim and then won't back it up. I can't argue with your feelings.