Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Harris the Magnanomous, President of All Americans, will have a Pub in cabinet

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Aug 29, 2024.

  1. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,309
    1,285
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    Obviously
     
  2. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,495
    1,877
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    This. One of the major problems with US politics is The electorate is nearly a 50-50 split on political party. But when one of the parties gets in power They treat it like it's a mandate and they got 100% of the vote. There's no compromise anymore and thus very little actual useful legislation gets passed. Coalitions are a good thing
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  3. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    13,881
    14,260
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Lol! Ty! That is perfect! Copied to my clipboard, tee'd up for wide distribution.
     
  4. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    13,881
    14,260
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Actually, the problem is that 1/2 of the country not only no longer fears or disdains communism, but seems willing to surrender our freedom to give it a try, bc...

    ... we're the special people for whom it will finally work, bc there is no end to debt spending, and therefore no need for accountability, fiscal responsibility, or even being productive... we've created the perfect currency that cannot collapse, and therefore we may write our own ticket, and go full Oprah on a national level...

    ...endless utopia...

    Half the country believes this, bc their Beijing puppet masters tell them so...

    ...and they'll tell you you're weird for not believing thusly.
     
  5. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,495
    1,877
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    You realize you're proving my point? Even if what you said is true (which it isn't) you'd still want a coalition govt to prevent radical communists from instilling their agenda. Otherwise, when radical Chicom Democrats get control they're just gonna install radical Chicom policies. And we know you don't want that.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,476
    1,558
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    This is the fear of a government dominated by one party: that like you, members of a party can only see the 80 mil people on the other side as evil idiots that must have decisions made for them. Of course, as Channing notes, that side feels the same way about you. And of course, both sides are usually wrong.

    Study finds people are consistently and confidently wrong about those with opposing views
     
  7. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    9,156
    2,109
    3,038
    Dec 16, 2015
    It’s a good point, the country is fairly split evenly.
    However, I disagree with your next point. What do you think we need passed?
    If anything, we need to repeal and decrease legislation.
    Gridlock is fine by me.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,483
    740
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    rick - is it irony to post a TDS video on a thread with no mentions of trump at the time?

    Remind me who has a bit of an obsession problem?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,390
    1,797
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    I think if your idea of intellectual diversity is "Democrat and Republican" then you are kind of a goober TBH
     
  10. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    10,437
    2,321
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Then you must love the border situation. Gridlock works!
     
  11. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,390
    1,797
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    We have a winner take all political system, I don't care for it, but it is what it is. Why the people most committed to the Constitution dont seem to understand this and keep hoping people operate against all the incentives, I can't say.
     
  12. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    10,788
    1,813
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    I agree, you are a goober.



    ;)
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,309
    1,285
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    The communism comments are so hyperbolic. Pure fear mongering.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  14. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,309
    1,285
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    Because we can’t all operate as shit heads or this country fails.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,476
    1,558
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    Perhaps, but if you don’t think that political parties inculcate group think among their members, I’m not sure your judgement regarding who is a goober is going to be very reliable either.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    16,940
    7,997
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    Id rather Harris stuff her in one.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,495
    1,877
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Imo, broadly speaking, the federal govt exists to serve 3 purposes. Secure the country (military and borders) protect individual rights, and regulate the economy where the free market fails (banking, insurance, healthcare, environment.)

    We're going to disagree on what that means, but that's what the govt should be doing.

    Gridlock isn't the same as small govt.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,495
    1,877
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Because the govt was set up for compromise to govern all. That's why the original vice president was the person who received the 2nd most votes. Thus almost guaranteeing having to work with the other party. It wasn't always winner take all. Our two party system injected with shitloads of money has caused that.
     
  19. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,495
    1,877
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    @GatorRade is a goober but he gets a seat at our toohot hazy IPA beer summit with me, you and @docspor
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,390
    1,797
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    I mean after Adams/Jefferson, they agreed that was stupid and changed the VP thing. This was within the lifetimes of the people that created it.