“Imane Khelif Wins First-Ever Gold Medal In Freestyle Domestic Violence”

This boxer tested as having XY chromosomes. Case closed.

 

Who's dodging??? Lololol

 

You are. You can't accept that the boxer has been proven to have XY chromosomes.

 

Cool. It's been proven. Moving on. Tell me what XXY and XYY are since chromosomes define if someone is a man or woman?

 

Maybe you ought to be concerned when an aberration goes knocking girls lights out…

 

Start a new thread since this was about a male who has been proven to have XY chromosomes. Not sure why you and others feel the need to go off topic.

 

Hahahahahahaha.

 

Do you think that males with unusually high levels of testosterone should be allowed to compete against males with levels of testosterone within the normal range?

 

If they’re not hurting women I’m not concerned about it.

 

Do you think that Yemby out to be allowed to play basketball because he’s a cat-quick 7-4 with a 7-8 wingspan ?

 

She is a woman. She may have some other unique advantages allegedly but she is female.

Just like a 7-foot male has advantages in basketball over a 6-foot one. It's always been a part of sports.

 

She is a male. Proven by multiple sex tests. Case closed. Move on to something else.

 

But birth certificate.

 

Birth certificates and genitalia at birth matter until they don't.

 

I think channing’s question is relevant, since this entire discussion is predicated on being able to distinguish the two sexes. Are there any cases where this distinction isn’t so cut and dried? Eg it seems you think that Khelif should use the men’s room despite having a vagina. It would then follow that you also think an XX person who has a penis and testicles and grew up a male should use the women’s room, which seems ironic. It also seems wrong to me at least.

 

How about aberrations getting knocked up?

 

My bad. I was sure I'd read early on that the IOC hadn't received the tests. But apparently it received at least something from the IBA.

https://www.reuters.com/sports/olym...t=PARIS, Aug 4 (Reuters),(IOC) said on Sunday.

 

Yes I do, unlike you and a number of other posters I don't think that genetic anomalies should disqualify athletes.

 

Look, instead of arguing about this we should all celebrate the fact that we all now believe that both sex and gender are constructed, and that conservatives have accepted the Butlerian thesis of gender as performance (or at least proved it in their insistence that someone born female is a "man").