IDK, Kam stated today that she honors anyone who served in the military……. and I guess it doesn’t matter if they (a) lied about the nature of their service, (b) their rank while serving, and (c) abandoned their reserve unit upon learning the unit would be activated to serve in the war against terror. I understand why Tim did not want to serve in the war against radical Islamic terror …. as he did not want to fight the relatives of so many of his future constituents.
The only thing worse than a career politician is putting an amateur with absolutely no political experience in the most powerful political position in the world and to make matters worse that amateur was afflicted with such an extreme case of Narcissistic Personality Disorder that believed that he knew more than of his experienced advisors who actually knew how government worked. If you needed brain surgery would you prefer a career neurosurgeon with 20 years experience or a recent medical school graduate who hadn't even completed a residency?
I hate both options. I’m not playing word games and I’m not stretching anything to say one is better than the other. As a conservative, I will never vote for a libbie and I hope Trump wins but with very strong reservation.
Lol don’t throw your back out there. Harris said she respects anyone who served. Walz served 25 years. You trying to somehow tie this to radical Islamic terror is hopelessly pathetic. To be fair I’d probably be throwing shit at the walls and desperately hoping it sticks if I were you.
“I don’t see eye to eye on any of his politics. I disagree with many of the things he’s enacted as governor…that he is a traitor or shirking his duty, in my opinion, is an unfair assessment of what took place.”
@g8trjax , you going to help me out here? I am not sure what I should be reading without your divine guidance. Are the Hill and BBC just arms of the Dem party?
Don't frequent either one, did they lie about, cover up or seem the least bit curious about joe's dementia for the last 4 years?
You don't have to frequent them to answer the question. Help me out here, I'm like a navy ship without a rudder until I can get some guidance from you. Are they MSM? If so, are they part of the Dem party? If so, please direct me to news sources that are allowed.
Said it before "swiftboating" Walz will have virtually impact on the Democratic ticket. As more than one poster mentioned in previous threads the vice presidential nominee usually has very little impact on the presidential ticket, the candidate on the top of the Republican ticket has much more baggage than Walz considering that said candidate with some help from his father manipulated the system to avoid any service at all in contrast to Walz's 24 years of service , made a rather feeble joke about his avoidance of service (avoiding STDs was Trump's personal Vietnam) and additionally made disparaging comments about actual veterans. I would also add that every poster who has attacked Walz would never vote for a Democratic ticket headed by Kamala Harris no matter who she selected as her running mate. She could have selected a legitimate winner of the Congressional Medal of Honor and they still would be supporting the former president.
So I'll take that as a no...this should help? Mainstream media (MSM) refers to the large mass news media outlets that have a significant influence on public opinion and reflect prevailing currents of thought. These typically include traditional forms of mass communication such as television, radio, newspapers, and magazines12. In the United States, examples of mainstream media outlets often include ABC News, CNN, Fox News, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal34. These outlets are contrasted with alternative media, which are smaller, independent, and often provide different perspectives.
So the WSJ and Fox are a wing of the dem party? Also, according to the reference you cited, the British Broadcasting Corp is part of the Dem party? You didn't recommend anything for me.
The only pattern I see is the flagrant dishonesty of the right. Clearly, this quote has been taken out of context to make him look bad. In her introduction, she said we appreciate your service "whether it's in a classroom or on the battlefield". He politely thanked her, saying "Thank you, Madame Speaker." What's he supposed to do??? Critique her introduction in front of an audience??? Classless!
The media disinformation campaign is quite remarkable. At what point do other countries begin calling it "state run media."
