Didn't watch. But I'll take that over a traitor who enacted a criminal conspiracy to overturn an election and happily watched for hours as hundreds of police were beaten.
Freedom of speech is not criminal in our Constitutional Republic... comrade. Trump never hurt one police officer... try again...
Tempting me to do that lame message board "reading comprehension" retort. Trump watched, and did NOTHING to stop it, while his violent rubes assaulted hundreds of cops, sending at least 100 to the hospital. And a criminal conspiracy like coercing state election officials and establishing fake elector slates is not "freedom of speech." Comrade. You can reply with falsehoods, based in the alternate reality in which you live, but that will only have people laugh at what you say. As they pretty much do. #Cult
Is that the Hollywood version of events? I'm pretty sure that tale is getting longer by the day. LMFAO!
Is it strange, or is it pleasant, to live in a self-created alternate reality where actual facts don't matter? Seems kind of odd to me. Do you have to converse solely with other fact-less people in order to avoid being mocked? WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - Donald Trump sat for hours watching the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol unfold on live TV, ignoring pleas by his children and other close advisers to urge his supporters to stop the violence, witnesses told a congressional hearing on Thursday. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us...-trump-supporters-three-hour-rage-2022-07-21/
Are you trying to say that Trump told people ton break into the Capital building? I'm sure you have some proof of that, if that's is what you are saying. Is it?
I'm saying exactly what I said. It's actually written down in posts above, in clear type. I think the font is fairly clean, shouldn't be too difficult for you to decipher. The posts use characters of the English language, which form words. So go back and read what I actually said, or continue to live in a fact-less alternate reality. Hell, I even provided you a linked article from one of the most widely accepted news sources in the world. oh.....LMFAO.
Wouldn't Trump's VP pick have to to reveal what he/she knew about Trump, when he/she knew it, and why he/she covered up for Trump??? After all, Trump is the one who's both a traitor and a convicted felon, with dozens of felony charges pending.
Yeah, Trump had nothing to do with what any single one of those people and what they did or didn't do... end of story. And he is INNOCENT until proven guilty, so quit saying he's guilty of any of that.
You could be on to something, but the wrong VP candidate. RFK Jr. views Biden as the threat to the republic, not Trump. Knowing Biden's time as president could end at any moment, he might accept the VP slot knowing he will move up when Biden can't function as president for even 6 hours a day or passes away. If you combine Biden's and RFK Jr.'s polling numbers, the race becomes competitive again. People would actually be voting for RFK Jr. over Trump. That's not a problem as lefties would vote for the Biden corps over Trump.
Wow! That is a WEAK defense! Think again. With your Trumpian logic, Osama bin Laden didn't hurt anyone either.
What exactly did Trump do in real time to stop his brownshirts from sacking the Capitol and threatening the lives of his VP and members of Congress??? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
LOL! Antifa BLM Occupy Sorry if I left any out as there have been so many. These groups have all called for violence against the police and actual murders have been committed by members of these groups. The amount of property damage has been massive. Who can ever forget violent protesters marching through the streets of New York chanting "What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now! It wasn't long after this that a single assailant attacked two policemen sitting in the squad car from behind murdering both officers. To my knowledge, the murderer was never apprehended. Pro-Palestinians should be on the list for their violence but left them off as no police have been murdered, yet. Can't have that much violence in a year featuring a change election, would only make it worse on the democrats running for office. All of these groups are sponsored or are sanctioned by the left in the US, not the right. The only weak defense is you being factually ignorant.
"And he is INNOCENT until proven guilty . . ." Of course. But, you believe that, even when he's "proven guilty", as he was in Manhatten, he's still INNOCENT. Hypocrite. If Trump knew he was innocent, he wouldn't have done everything possible to delay his trial. Instead, he would welcome the trial, knowing the prosecution would fail to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Us : apply legal recourse to cited groups (or members) for committing and/or inciting violence - probably starting with grand juries or trials, ending with possible legal consequences. Also us : apply legal recourse to Trump for committing and/or inciting violence- probably starting with grand juries or trials, ending with possible legal consequences. --------------------------- You : apply legal recourse to cited groups (or members) for committing and/or inciting violence - probably starting with grand juries or trials, ending with possible legal consequences. Also you : Trump dindu nuffin' !!! Holding hearings or a trial to find out is nothing but....LAWFARE!!!!!! The childishness of your arguments is both laughable and astounding.
"Antifa BLM Occupy" YOU brought up Antifa, BLM and Occupy, not me. Then, when I respond to YOUR off-topic post, you say I'm off topic. LOL!!! "The only weak defense is you being factually ignorant." YOU accuse me of being "factually ignorant". Then, when I respond to YOUR off-topic BS with FACTS you can't refute, you again say I'm off topic. LOL!!! Suggestion . . . . Don't bring up stuff you don't want to discuss.
