I fear for your granddaughter also. I fear she encounters an illegal immigrant at the wrong place at the wrong time. Thanks Joe Biden. Reality check.
I am sure then that you can show the data that the claims are not correct. For example, let's start with New York City. The claim is that NYC murder fell by 18%. Show me how that is incorrect.
Hmmm, so your claim is that numbers of illegal immigrants are way up and that they are regularly murdering people at a rate to cause concern. And yet, the overall murder rate is going down. How does that work? Did all US citizens just stop murdering people? Legal immigrants? International tourists? How do you square these numbers?
Trump will use this SC decision to justify doing pretty much whatever he wants. He won't be removed from office by the Senate because that requires two thirds of them voting to convict and that will never happen. And after he gets out of office (if he leaves at all) using the immunity defense he can tie up any legal proceedings indefinitely ('wasting time' as you agree he is doing in the NY case) and at his age, likely never face accountability.
Hmmm, so what do you fear happens when she encounters them at "the wrong place, at the wrong time?" They will teach her how to speak a foreign language?
Yeah that was what I was getting at. If the president declared a person, or group of people, as terrorists (which I assume they can do) then they would be 100% legally protected, despite the grotesqueness.
True reality check ( it must get tiresome to be wrong so much) " "Some of the most extensive research comes from Stanford University. Economist Ran Abramitzky found that since the 1960s, immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than U.S.-born people. There is also state level research, that shows similar results: researchers at the CATO Institute, a libertarian think tank, looked into Texas in 2019. They found that undocumented immigrants were 37.1% less likely to be convicted of a crime." Seems Cons hate facts.
I get it. If I didn't want policy or competency, I'd vote for Trump too. As an added bonus, you get his dementia!
To iterate, RTFR. All governance requires a measure of "presuming good faith." Consider you are a MAGA-ite - do you think Biden's DOJ is acting in good faith prosecuting novel/created crimes - see Friday's USSC ruling, not yesterday's ruling for that discussion.
Stanford research, right. Like that’s going to be unbiased… I would think that most immigrants from the 60’s through 2007 were likely from Southeast Asia, Europe and certain areas of Africa under duress from commie-backed militias. In general these are considered to be relatively low on the crime spectrum. Contrast that with Obama’s border gaffes and, most recently, Biden’s open border. We have been deluged with the lowest of the low from all around the globe, including Red China, Russia and satellites, Iran, Venezuela, El Salvador, Cuba and many others. If the FBI were to keep accurate crime records, with all area’s reporting, we will see a rapid increase in the crime rate, especially violent crime.
Reading is essential. The quote states :"since the 1960s, immigrants are 60% less likely to be incarcerated than U.S.-born people." It does not stop, per your misguided reference, at 2007. By all means please link any confirmed source for your conspiracy idea that the FBI is at fault. Crying "Fake news" is juvenile, non-productive and without a subsequent assertion of additional data.... a waste of time.
We have several Cuban descended posters here. Wonder what they think of being lumped in with the “lowest of the low” and sources of future violent crime? Outside of Central/South American gang activity, not sure what connection you have to increased crime rates. Statistically, that just ain’t so even with some element of gangs baked in. With any Chinese or Iranians (or Russians) you would of course have to be concerned with possible spy activity or potentially even terrorism or sabotage. Nobody denies that as a potentiality. But there would also be legitimate reasons to flee those regimes. They all probably lower our “violent crime” rates.
You spew out a lot of words, and cloak them in pseudo-legalese jargon. But at the end of the day, you're just excuse making and shilling for a traitorous criminal. There was nothing "official" about Trump's criminal conspiracy to overturn an election. From the fake elector slates to the regular public lying to the coercion of state officials and others. Nor was there any reason for the USSC to take appx 120 days to deliver this....continued stall tactic for a criminal. He should have been on trial for all of this long ago. It's all just criminals defending other criminals. And people like you trying to shill for them.
