The Fuhrer removes the Orlando State Attorney from office

Yeah? And which ones are that? lol

Also, are you suggesting any delegation made by Congress is Constitutionally valid?

The fact that Joe Biden is still trying this as of May 2024 gives away the game. He didn’t pursue the policy because of the pandemic. He pursued it because it happens to be policy he likes, probably because pumping money to their constituents is the oldest play in the Democrats’ playbook.

 

Let's stick to the one from the article I shared earlier.

That is an extremely overbroad interpretation of Congress's authority to delegate.

It's absolutely relevant. It suggests that the pandemic was an excuse to enact policy Joe Biden likes and still likes rather than an emergency situation prompting emergency action.

Classic abuse of authority, dare I say authoritarian.

 

We should all go in on a gift certificate to Ruby Tuesday’s for 715 when he passes the bar exam.

 

We're talking in circles.

"Student loan forgiveness on the scale proposed in these regulations clearly meets the major economic or political threshold. The overturned loan forgiveness plan was estimated to cost around $500 billion. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates this one would cost $250–750 billion once you include the economic hardship provisions (which are still under development)."

https://www.cato.org/blog/bidens-newest-folly-student-loan-forgiveness

Delegation on this level is a phenomenon that began in the 20th century.

If this was the founding generation's understanding of separation of powers and delegation of powers, why did SCOTUS typically reject delegations from Congress to the Executive Branch until the 20th century?

I'm not arguing that the statute had a mens rea requirement. I made my point exactly as I wrote it: "It suggests that the pandemic was an excuse to enact policy Joe Biden likes and still likes rather than an emergency situation prompting emergency action."

I've already provided the Merriam-Webster definition of authoritarianism on this very thread.

Authoritarianism: "of, relating to, or favoring a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people."

Definition of AUTHORITARIAN

Let's see:
1) Favoring concentration of power: The President has more unchecked power under your view (and his view). Check.
2) In a leader or an elite: The President is a leader and elite, as is the Secretary of Education. Check.
3) Not Constitutionally responsible to the people. The President and Secretary of Education are acting beyond the scope of their authority, the President is elected but is one person, the Secretary of Education isn't. The President in acting beyond the scope of his authority, is diluting the will of the people, and is thereby acting in authoritarian fashion in a manner consistent with the use of the word on this forum. Trump and DeSantis are accountable to the people, they have always been accountable to the people, and were both elected. That hasn't stopped people like you from characterizing both of them as authoritarians. So no, if we're being fair, Biden doesn't deserve to get off the hook just because he was elected. He acts as though his power is absurdly broad in scope, effectively centralizing the power of the federal government, and thereby undermining separation of powers and the will of the people. Check.