Ask yourself who liberals hated more, Stalin or Putin?. Breshnev or Putin?. Putin is hated for supporting Christianity and traditional family values Hard for liberals to hate communists from what I've noticed.
You should never expect anything from me. I don't have the inclination to teach you the most basic things that you have skipped over to get to the abstract.
Well, your premise might be a tad premature--even in the US, we see churches up North closing constantly, while in the South, churches continue to grow--especially Catholic churches. Here's a look at the case globally: Shifting from Global North to Global South The percentage of the world that is Christian has changed very little over the last 120 years. In 1900, 34.5 percent of the world was Christian; in 2020, the figure is 32.3 percent. This relative stability, however, masks dramatic changes in Christianity’s demographics. The bar chart below reveals that 82 percent of all Christians in 1900 lived in Europe and North America; by 2020 this figure had dropped dramatically to 33 percent. The shrinking in the Global North and the shifting to the Global South is the essence of World Christianity’s characteristics at the start of the 21st century. Like the rest of the world, Christianity is also becoming increasingly urban, with the rise of cities in the Global South with large Christian populations, like Lagos and Kinshasa. The perception of Christianity around the world today is that it is a white religion, which is fair because for the last 1,000 years or so, it was. White, western history, theology, and training were dominant and were exported around the world for centuries. However, despite the perception, the reality is that Christianity is a majority non-white religion. Christianity’s shift is also evident in the mother tongues of Christians: the language with the most Christian speakers is Spanish (because of Latin America, not Spain), followed by English, Portuguese (because of Brazil, not Portugal), Russian (because of the Russian Orthodox), and Mandarin Chinese. Is Christianity Shrinking or Shifting? - Lausanne Movement As for Atheists and Muslims--they seem to be united in their desire to take the US down, along with Western civilization--e.g.--China (commie atheist) trippin over itself to turn us against our selves, and suicide ourselves as a nation, and of course, pretty much every corner of mohammy-stan, clamoring for "death to America" (along with death to Israel). According to the OP, there seems to be an overlapping interest in, and coordinate effort to, undermining Judeo-Christian culture/society throughout Europe, by atheist Eurocrats, by permitting the flooding in of willing Muslim accomplices. Let's turn the tables--how'd you feel, if your beloved liberalism, including religious freedom--including your freedom to not subscribe to religion at all--appeared to be systematically targeted and sought to be replaced, with religious (pick your flavor) institutions? ...and non-religious liberalism was being systematically labeled inherently hateful, because why to deny God, that's just hateful! To your (and my) American liberty loving sensibilities, that may sound absurd. But if you started to see--hell, forget hypotheticals--look at how much extrapulation the TDS crowd has engaged in, to equate Trump with Hitler and the KKK etc? TBL--at it's worst, the speech in the OP could be considered reverse TDS European style. At it's worst. Otherwise, I heard a citizen's voice concerned for the rapid deterioration of her cultural heritage, and a hypothesis as to the cause of the infirmity.
That's going a bit far. We worked with Stalin, only bc of Hitler--who literally declared war on the US in the wake of Pearl Harbor (???<--I know...I could never figure that one out...)--and as soon as Hitler was defeated, nary a second wasted, Stalin and the Soviets displaced Hitler and the 3rd Reich as public enemy #1. Barely time for a commercial break bt WW II and the cold war... ...and Breshnev was in charge when Reagan came out and dubbed them "the evil empire." Now yes, Putin is disliked more than Yeltsin or Gorby, but not Stalin or Breshnev (or Kruschev...)..
There's a sense of irony, likely lost on you, that a Catholic is decrying American loss of religious values because we are being replaced. The exact same thing was said about Catholics, with too many Irish and Italians coming into the country. When JFK, the first Catholic President was elected, many Americans were worried the country would become Catholic, and would be beholden to the Pope! The more things change, the more they stay the same. Just replace Catholics with atheists and Muslims, and the argument from the 1950's is the exact same Great Replacement Theory argument we hear today. And make no mistake, the GRT is racist, with racist roots and racist messages. It fuels racist and violent acts. There is no way to separate out the message that white, Anglo-Saxons are being replaced that makes it not racist.
In 1926 these guys were protesting against the replacement of "real Americans" (Protestants from Western Europe) by Catholics and to a lesser extent Jews from Eastern and Southern Europe. “America First:” The Ku Klux Klan Influence on Immigration Policy in the 1920s By the way it was my grandparents who immigrated to the US from Eastern Europe that were among those groups that were the subject of their protest.
Do you honestly think Hispanics will continue coming if the USA becomes the gender confused, atheist Mecca that you libbies are working so hard to create? Answer: They won’t.
First of all, I do not 'subscribe' to the theory. I never looked into it, dismissing it outright vs a vis the US--but the OP, gave me pause to think. She made some compelling claims there, like listing off the major Euro cities where their populations are now <50% homegrown; kids growing up in Germany converting to Islam, to fit in; rapes (of European girls by Muslim men) occurring far more frequently through out Europe... Those are matters worth looking into. That doesn't mean that therefore I believe she's preaching gospel truth. To illustrate--had she made the same claim re GRT, and backs it up with "...just today some dark skinned dudes whistled at me", "I was on the subway, and this dude looked at me lustingly", or "a teacher in school taught about Ramadan", I'd have dismissed it outright. Secondly, I'm well aware of the Protestants' claims about Catholics in the US. That was kind of minor, compared to other episodes in history. How about the Iberian Peninsula? for 800 years, it was under Moorish (Muslim) rule. It was not Muslim prior to that; it was Christian. Was it wrong for Christians on the IP to seek to avoid losing their land and their cultural heritage to the Moors, before the moors took it over? ...and while your justifying your judgment of those Iberian Christians, save some for the Muslims--because they still, to this day, long to recapture the IP, and reinstate the chaliphates there. The initial conquest of the IP only took 8 years. 800 years to kick them off the peninsula, vs 8 years for the Moors to take it over. Your myopic view of history seems to prevent you from seeing other possibilities. TBL--Whitey isn't the only baddy in history or on the planet, and in fact, is quite capable of losing. ...and your smug disdain for the Judeo-Christian civilized society which you take for granted i would submit, could be lost for 800+ years, in a matter of 8. But let us not dare allow for such possibilities--that'd be *racist*--let us insulate our selves, and our sensibilities, and only contemplate la la rainbow unicorn kumbaya land, where nothing can ever go really wrong. Only mildly wrong stuff, is permitted in la la land.
Actually....we're a pretty pragmatic bunch regardless of nationality. As long as so many Latin American countries continue being corrupt, unstable and crappy, and the US continues to afford stability and opportunity and $$$....they'll keep coming, along with Indians, Pakistani's, Chinese, Koreans, and everyone else who's homeland is unstable, and does not afford opportunity, gender bendy crap notwithstanding. I'd submit you'd look right past it too, if it came down to providing for your family, vs dealing with tranny's...
A lot can go wrong, and does go wrong, all over the world. There is no unicorn kumbaya land that exists on this planet...and there probably never will be. What we can do is strive to be better. Change is a constant. And white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants aren't going to be the majority in the US in the future. Protestant is already only a plurality religion, and sometime, likely before 2050, Caucasian won't be the majority race. I ask, why is this a problem? People of quality should not fear those seeking equality. The American experiment should be able to thrive regardless of the ethnic makeup of its citizens. If not, the city on the hill is nothing more than a mirage, and a failed experiment.
Not concerned with anyone's color. "Ppl of good will" is my standard, which I adopt as my own, from the Church (i.e.--not pretending at originality there). That said, our resources aren't infinite, and it seems rather ironic that the party that is home to the enviro-fascists who ever want to dictate how everyone lives due to the finite-ness of the planet's resources, are also home to the party of "let everyone in! our resources are infinite!!!" ...but the ltd. resources aspect aside...why do we let the blatant law breakers in with impunity, while making the law abiding jump through every hoop imaginable, to gain legal entry? Seems just about inconsistent. And having endured 9/11...who has succumb to the absurd notion that human nature has somehow changed so drastically in the last 23 years, that terrorists are no longer a concern??? We let 10,000,000+ unvetted ppl in. From everywhere. chicoms, terrorist banned countries, fenty dealers, imported fenty accounting for 100k lives per year, sex trafficers, gang bangers, drug dealers, on and on... Do these sound like racist concerns to you?
You're racist, the old shut down the argument card. All they want is new voters, if all these illegals were trump lovers, they'd be mowing them down at the border.
Do you think people in other areas don't use resources? It is difficult to come up with a better example of dictating how somebody lives their lives than telling them that they aren't allowed to take a job, who wants to hire them, because they aren't currently in the country. Mostly because the "legal" immigration system is so broken and based in such a flawed view that it is not really fixable. We would do a lot better going back to the policies of Pre-1925 minus the Chinese Exclusion Act and similar obviously racist policy. Yeah, we probably shouldn't have most drug laws either, as those incentivize criminal organizations to find innovative new drugs to make it easier to import their products. Fentanyl doesn't happen on this scale if it weren't for the billions we spend stopping other drugs. Drug dealers are business people. They don't want to kill their customers, if for no other reason than that means less money for them. But we have incentivized them to choose to produce a less ideal product so as to better avoid the massive enforcement state around drugs.