Ok, time to say so long. No point in subjecting myself anymore to jabs/barbs. I’ll close by suggesting: this FSK Bridge was a white hat operation big time. Why? What was the Evergreen grounded for? Same thing as in the Suez…disrupting trades/routes of illicit commodities (children). What was the cargo of both? Besides armaments, drugs to kill off more people, children. That collision was pure controlled demolition and a huge loss to the deep state for the port and shipping channels. For the low vibe crowd, even Tik Tok has been forthcoming with decent intel. It’s been real, Gators……
If it's an interstate bridge, the Federal Government rebuilds it, and sues the shipping company to recover as much as possible.
Wait, what research have we done to move from our initial assertion that the shipwreck was an attack by America’s adversaries to somehow disrupt our cyber capabilities along the Mason Dixon line, to this new and completely different interpretation that the shipwreck was actually the work of friendly forces to stop the deep state from importing children through the Port of Baltimore? Cause that’s a pretty big change…
Talking heads keep talking about bumpers when they should be talking about tug boats. The mass of the bigger ships make tugs a much more effective option. Baltimore recently upgraded their port and did nothing re: the bridge
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2023/12/17/inside-the-port-of-baltimores-550-million-upgrade.html Upgraded lots of stuff for bigger ships, nothing for bridge safety
I see your point in that to get it done as fast as possible the federal government should take charge, pay the bills and then recover the money from the shipping company. If their insurance company doesn't cover all of the expense the shipping company is still liable I believe.
So let me see if I have this right. It was an attack. NO ONE is taking credit for it. Not one person. Next- Mason Dixon silliness: While the border state of Maryland is definitively below the line, it never left the Union during the Civil War, although slavery remained legal until 1864. Name the sources? Nope, she is a traitorous liar
I’m missing it too now. Apparently observing that those are two very different conspiracies was a bridge too far (no pun intended).