White Female Student in Critical Condition After Being Beaten by another teen

No one is buying what you’re selling…

 

So you are saying you can’t. Got it.

 

Tell me you can’t do it without saying you can’t do it.

 

How about we back off the accusations, please.

 

Didn't notice I was gone but you posted several times in the thread discussing my disappearance?
Maybe you need to spend a little more time taking care of your health/memory and a little less time starting misleading, pearl-clutching threads.

 

Can we at least agree the thread as originally posted was an example of race baiting? That’s not to say the OP is racist people can have their own opinions on that but I don’t think anyone has said so outright.

 

it was certainly a thread based on race.

 

Very few because there are not many "both sides" issues to commonplace crimes.

Why, it's almost like these threads don't belong on this forum.

 

I corrected the title to what it should have been in the first place. Yes, there were other fights going on, but the girl was not beaten by a mob. She was beaten by another teen.

 

So chick fight between two teens. The one who got her ass kicked happened to be white.

 

The author of the article prominently identifies the girl who was hospitalized as being White despite conceding that it is unclear what caused the fight. The description of the White girl being beaten by a "mob" is belied by the video. Those aspects are consistent with a narrative being pushed, and that narrative is also reflected in the comments section. To me, it looks like the White girl threw the first punch and that one of the Black girls tried to help her when she was clearly in trouble. Regardless of who was the initial aggressor, there are limits to self defense arguments when you're slamming someone's head into the ground.

 

By a poster who starts black-on-white crime threads with regularity.

 

Easy on the OP. This was his second idea for a thread.

 

You responded to that thread several times, yet claim you had no knowledge of my absence. Timing is irrelevant, but you did in fact respond to the thread before I even knew there was one.

To be fair, not too concerned with your mental health, just the people that have to tolerate your inaccurate threads based on crappy sources. As I type this, you have 30% of the most recent threads.
How does that work for you? Wake up in the morning, yell at kids on your lawn and then spend the day looking at bias "news" sources reporting crap so that you can post them on here with misleading thread titles. To what end other than for everyone to point out you are wrong?