Florida officials move to ban people from sleeping on public property

Head west…California will take ya.

 

I like that the bill will provide some needed amenities. I wonder if citizens can sue governments that dont provide them the same way they can sue governments that allow overnight camps on public property.

 

I'd like for them to help solve the homeless problem, but this ain't it.

 

Camps or greyhound therapy to places Desantis doesn't like?

 

More "pro-life" BS from the Republi-ban Terror Group.

Where are all the phony Christians who post here all the time about how they are so "pro-life"?? This is your answer??

Well, since most you hypocrites are Republi-ban and do not know the first thing about Christianity, I will leave this here for you to ponder (despite running counter to the commands of the Orange god and his minions like Meatball Ron):

- Mathew 25:34-40

 

Thou shall not sleep under the bridge near my house.

 

I think you raise a valid point that our ideals don’t always seem to match the language of the legislation we support. And I personally think this particular policy is unlikely to be useful for achieving anyone’s desired ends.

I do also think that in order to be properly fair to the people of which you speak, we should recognize that different levels of organization call for different modes of organization. The behavior that I would most want my child to exhibit toward a person in need sitting in front of her isn’t necessarily the same that we should want as a national policy geared toward all persons. At larger scales, these are extremely complex problems that call for very nuanced solutions. One isn’t necessarily a hypocrite to call for personal compassion at the same time as supporting reduced levels of government welfare.

 

We know now of at least one non-Christian: the one who gave you the come on man. SMH!

 

It'll only work if it works both ways.

 

Is the state providing funding for the camps?

 

Is there a reason that shouldn’t be left up to the towns and cities?

 

This is where the state focused its efforts instead of trying to do something about a problem facing everyone, like runaway insurance costs?

Seems like a solution in search of a problem to me, and one better left to local officials.

 

This was the case in years past, (sleeping on sidewalks, etc) then court decisions and lawsuits….. Curious what they have added to the laws to help. Too lazy to read up on the recent decade of laws…..

 

They've passed a bill similar to this for the entire state of Tennessee. I can tell you first hand working in an emergency department in Knoxville. It's not working. The state is not doing much to provide all the so-called amenities for the unhoused that it promised. And there's only two to three homeless shelters available, that I wouldn't use for a humane society.

 

This bill is not addressing any "support" for people in need. This bill is strictly an attempt to remove the "unclean masses" from our sights and make it increasingly difficult for those people to live in Florida so they leave. Nothing more and there is nothing nuanced about that.

Further, it is blatant hypocrisy from politicians and Too Hot posters alike who thump their chests and throw out some BS slogan like "pro-life" and then turn around and make laws not to help the very life they claimed to be "pro", but rather make it harder on that life. So much so, maybe they just leave and become someone else's problem.
These are the very same hypocrites and cowards who posted on this very board that they would gladly open their homes and take in the unwanted babies rather than see them be aborted. Here they are.....hypocrites move.