Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Shocking new report: Companies dodge taxes, and water is wet

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Feb 29, 2024.

  1. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,188
    2,649
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    In an earth shattering and shocking report released yesterday the Institute of Tax and Economic Policy concluded that corporations are dodging taxes through loop holes left open by the Trump tax law and are only paying 14% in taxes.

    Meanwhile profits are at an all time high, equity is at an all time high, and the deficit is still high - although much lower than the Trump era. Something is rotten in Denmark.


    Corporate Tax Avoidance in the First Five Years of the Trump Tax Law

    upload_2024-2-29_8-31-27.png


    The tax overhaul signed into law by former President Donald Trump in 2017 cut the federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, but during the first five years it has been in effect, most profitable corporations paid considerably less than that. This is mainly due to loopholes and special breaks that the 2017 tax law left in place and, in some cases, introduced. Corporate tax avoidance occurs because Congress allows it to occur, and the Trump tax law in many ways made it worse. The corporate minimum tax and expanded tax enforcement funding signed into law in 2022 by President Biden could begin to reduce corporate tax avoidance, as would other proposals from the White House that have not yet become law.

    This study examines federal corporate income taxes paid by the largest profitable corporations from 2018 through 2022. Because the corporations included in this study were profitable each year for all five of those years, one would reasonably expect that they would pay significant taxes. But in many cases, they did not.

    • The 342 companies included in this study paid an average effective income tax rate of just 14.1 percent during this five-year period, almost a third less than the statutory rate of 21 percent.
    • Nearly a quarter of the corporations in this study (87 companies) paid effective tax rates in the single digits or less during this five-year period.
     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. G8R92

    G8R92 GC Hall of Fame

    3,328
    381
    378
    Feb 5, 2010
    The very same corporations that are part of the portfolios of the 401K millionaires you credit Bidenomics for.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1
  3. shaun10

    shaun10 Senior

    290
    69
    1,828
    Apr 3, 2007
    This study examines federal corporate income taxes paid by the largest profitable corporations from 2018 through 2022.

    "Because the corporations included in this study were profitable each year for all five of those years, one would reasonably expect that they would pay significant taxes."

    What does "significant" mean here? I have always felt that, like individuals, companies should pay whatever the tax rate is based on current law. I think any loophole presents potential problems as it provides a means to exploit the system. Having said that, I think tax rates above 20% are outrageous, especially when being sent to a federal government that wastes those tax dollars by the billions. I say lower the tax rates, get rid of loopholes, and force the government to work from a budget with less money. There will still be enough to go around.
     
  4. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,336
    2,124
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    I see the stupidty of our tax code every end of December when I have to spend random money on shit and hold deposits until January to avoid earnings. It's so dumb every year
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,188
    2,649
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    A close study of Bidenomics would have taught you that it is only responsible for the good things in the economy.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,188
    2,649
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Glad you asked, "significant" means the applicable tax rate times the record earnings.
     
  7. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    10,172
    2,482
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Do you think more than 20% is outrageous because you don’t like how the revenue is spent or simply because corporations shouldn’t have to pay more than 20%? If the latter, why?
     
  8. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,336
    2,124
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    I always love to rile up some posters on this board when I say corporate tax rate should be 0. The cost of taxes get passed on to the consumer anyway. So we might as well collect taxes where they finish their travels, at the individual. Lower corporate taxes, higher individual taxes at upper brackets.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,376
    1,919
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Corporations are people though, so just tax them too at the higher rate under the income tax since they are 'individuals'
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    10,172
    2,482
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    That’s what SCOTUS has said.
     
  11. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,757
    1,650
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    It is interesting how correct this formulation seems to me and you, and how obviously villainous it seems to most other people.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  12. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,727
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    As long as we get rid of the company car and phone.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,757
    1,650
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    I will go even further in the riling up category by saying not only do I think 0% is the right corporate tax rate, I also think Citizens was the right decision regarding corporate speech. Taxing corporations doesn’t help actual people, but limiting corporate speech does actually hurt actual people.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,969
    842
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    foreign investors like that idea. And they make up a substantial % of stocks owned.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. shaun10

    shaun10 Senior

    290
    69
    1,828
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think how the revenue is spent is a different topic. To the second point, I could ask you the same. Why does the Federal government feel they have the right to take upwards of 20%? I don't care how much money a company makes, in my opinion 20% should be about the cap. Why, because it's 1/5, and I think that's plenty. It's a simple as that.
     
  16. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,423
    8,147
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    Who gets the deduction for the frozen embryos in Alabama, the parents or the lab?

    On a serious note every entity or person that can, takes advantage of the tax code where allowable. I'd be mad at my accountant if he didn't, and companies owe a fiduciary obligation to their shareholders, not the IRS of federal government.

    At a minimum we should get rid of double taxation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    10,172
    2,482
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Why a separate rule for corporations, who are “persons”? Human persons pay as much as 37%. I read somewhere that Amazon, for example, paid just 6% on $35 billion in profits. Tesla paid zero. My marginal tax rate was higher than both.
     
  18. shaun10

    shaun10 Senior

    290
    69
    1,828
    Apr 3, 2007
    I agree with you there, so was mine(MTR). So somewhere between 37% and 0% is a happy medium... hence my 20%. And get rid of "loopholes".
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,336
    2,124
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    I mean, were talking about a complete overhaul of our tax system that will never happen. But yeah, you two aren't wrong. All this stuff would have to change
     
  20. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,237
    465
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    35 trillion in debt and a yearly 1.5 trillion deficit...raise taxes on everyone! That'll fix everything. :emoji_joy: