Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Chris Beard objects to officiating

Discussion in 'Nuttin but Net' started by akaGatorhoops, Feb 22, 2024.

  1. akaGatorhoops

    akaGatorhoops GC Columnist VIP Member

    14,354
    2,568
    3,348
    Apr 10, 2007
    My opinion of this guy has been tainted… maybe unfairly.
    But I will give him this: he handled his complaints perfectly…, unapologetically, but also without making it seem like sour grapes or excuses. This was strong.

     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. akaGatorhoops

    akaGatorhoops GC Columnist VIP Member

    14,354
    2,568
    3,348
    Apr 10, 2007
    And I would call this more than a coincidence… Doug Shows and Pat Adams were 2/3 of the crew.

    Shows is “inconsistent” at best. Adams is objectively the worst.
     
    • Agree Agree x 7
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. BTEGator

    BTEGator GC Hall of Fame

    15,528
    134
    523
    May 24, 2007
    The question is...can and will anything be done about it?

    The home cooking is so obvious across the SEC. Our game last night was ridiculous.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    5,012
    2,608
    2,498
    Dec 3, 2019


    Stuff like this carries over beyond the foul itself. When guys feel they can't play defense without getting a foul it changes the way they play defense at all. Same with how physical they were allowed to be, on defense AND offense.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 3
  5. GatorPlanet

    GatorPlanet GC Hall of Fame

    9,235
    2,145
    1,088
    Apr 15, 2007
    Maitland, FL
    Yeah, I was wondering about the call on Haugh during the live action. Maybe Tommy looked at Sears too hard.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
  6. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    5,012
    2,608
    2,498
    Dec 3, 2019
    Insult to injury considering how sears was bowling into defenders on his drives. That has to get into a defenders head.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  7. audiogatorjim

    audiogatorjim GC Hall of Fame

    1,581
    731
    1,833
    Mar 15, 2009
    Both our guards are better than cocky Mr. Sears Roebuck.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    3,933
    1,048
    2,008
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    the refs stole the game from us, plain and simple. some people like to think refs don't affect games that much, and those people have never played sports
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    3,933
    1,048
    2,008
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    very composed, considering. this conference needs a wholesale firing of these dirty refs...and maybe a full audit on their assets and spending
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Bowiegator

    Bowiegator Junior

    148
    102
    1,923
    Apr 3, 2007
    Question: I thought we did not have conference affiliated refs in basketball? I know we have them in football which I despise but I thought college basketball refs are just in regions and are not paid by conferences and do not report to a conference. Is that correct or incorrect?
     
  11. gatorific

    gatorific VIP Member

    622
    120
    1,863
    Apr 20, 2010
    A&M too - and even a fairly called foul laden game is a huge disadvantage for us because it fundamentally changes the pace and vibe of the game.
    We may not be the most physical bunch, but I think we’d always benefit from a “let them play “ type of game
     
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1
  12. gatorific

    gatorific VIP Member

    622
    120
    1,863
    Apr 20, 2010
    The double bonus was created to combat the late game foul parade when the trailing team was hoping for missed front ends -
    Routinely seeing teams in the DB with 5-6 minutes to go is a problem in my book - WAY too much officiating impact , especially when you consider the subjectivity of many of the calls. There’s almost always some contact, even on “clean” plays , so the refs have a significant say in the way games play out.
    We dominated Auburn, but I think we also may have benefited from the backlash of the 85 free throw game just prior. Lots of contact both ways in the Auburn game, but refs did a good job differentiating meaningful contact , from the incidental
    Of course, it helped that we won, but it was a much better game to watch, like the first half vs Bama- end to end action, went 5 mins or so with no stoppages.

    I think that should be the officiating goal / mandate from the league office.