Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Judge orders Trump to pay nearly $355 million in civil fraud trial

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by StrangeGator, Feb 16, 2024.

  1. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,873
    415
    328
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think it was Phil who raised a great analogy to insider trading. Who's the victim with insider trading? The brokerage firm got their fees and is happy. The counterparty buyer/seller agreed to the transaction at an agreed upon price with which they were happy. The "victim" is incrementally spread amongst thousands of investors which makes is challenging to identify a specific victim.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  2. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    14,938
    13,147
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Don't like the laws that are on the books? Contact your elected representatives and tell you want the laws repealed. They wouldn't be singing this same tune if say HILLARY did the exact same thing. hypocrites.
     
  3. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    19,922
    1,596
    1,513
    Apr 8, 2007
    Keeping in mind that Scott Adams area of expertise is a cartoonist not as a legal scholar with expertise on business ethics.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    19,922
    1,596
    1,513
    Apr 8, 2007
    We don't convict for future crimes although we (the legal system) do impose severe penalties to deter future bad behavior not to mention as punishment for past behavior.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    6,320
    2,409
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    This was not a criminal trial, it was a civil trial. There was no conviction, or even liability, based on future conduct. Part of the statute was disgorgement, a deterrent, so that fraud in the future would be discouraged. “What happens next time” is absolutely relevant to a case where the City is suing to protect the People against fraudulent conduct.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,197
    675
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
    Doesn't anyone think it is funny for everyone to say there were no victims of Trumps cheating since these loans didn't go bad, meanwhile the guy literally has declared bankruptcy 6 times?
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  7. gaterzfan

    gaterzfan GC Hall of Fame

    1,627
    313
    1,698
    Feb 6, 2020
    It's tough to prove a negative. Do you possess any substantive verifiable evidence any entity "lost out" on a deal because of any Trump organization transaction? Seems if there were injured parties, they would have come forth and testified in the recent trial and/or the financial institutions that loaned money to the Trump organization would have provided that evidence.

    As of today, there is no evidence any specific entity or "the marketplace" suffered because of the deals involved in the Trump fraud case. If there was such evidence .... I'm confident Letricia James and Art Engoron would have produced it during the trial.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  8. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,526
    11,767
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    interest accruing at $87k per day..

    and apparently using his real estate as collateral isn't being accepted so well by the folks who sell bonds

    Trump faces obstacles to securing an appeal bond in fraud case (cnbc.com)

    Trump on Friday was ordered to pay about $355 million in penalties, plus more than $98 million in interest after a judge found the former president liable for fraud for manipulating financial statements given to lenders. Every day, the accruing interest adds $87,502 to Trump’s bill.

    Unless he wants to pay the entire penalty while his expected appeal is considered, Trump will need to post an appeal bond. This is typically up to 120% of the judgment plus the current interest.

    At that rate, Trump’s original ruling with interest would indicate he will need to secure a bond worth more than $540 million. But it’s unlikely that the real estate baron will be able to use his properties as collateral. It’s “not very attractive to take real estate as collateral,” said Neil Pedersen, owner of New York-based surety bond agency Pedersen & Sons.

    Trump could have to liquidate some assets to secure a bond, said Pedersen. The bond company will also charge a fee that could total millions of dollars.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  9. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,873
    415
    328
    Apr 3, 2007
    So he just needs to sell 220 pairs of shoes per day. Easy peasy
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,564
    956
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    Interesting point. The specific amounts do seem incredible here. But your post made me think of a possible criminal law analogy (I know this wasn't criminal) - that someone can't be punished for driving under the influence unless and until they actually hit somebody.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,685
    22,497
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    It is somewhat worrisome to me that if trump were to win re-election with a $500m debt what he might do to settle the debt. The man has no honor or integrity and I wonder which of our secrets and plans he would sell to whom.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2024
    • Agree Agree x 5
  12. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,197
    675
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
    I wonder if there are any left he hasn't already sold based on the piles they found and haven't found at MLG.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,526
    11,767
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    he already has documents that the gubmnt never found. those are probably already being auctioned off or included int he sale of an overpriced penthouse somewhere
     
  14. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,685
    22,497
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Prime sting opportunity
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,256
    2,472
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    I used to think MAGA Nation would just need a LOT of moral compasses to be recalibrated after Trump was gone. That was obviously incorrect, replacement transplants will be required. The issue is likely to be the scarcity of Republican donors.

    People defending Trump's outright fraud here...SMH.

    Lock your doors people.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  16. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    8,114
    994
    328
    Sep 11, 2022
    Even if he loses, you realize he’s not going to pay anything on either suit, don’t you?
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  17. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,685
    22,497
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    He stiffed carpenters, painters, piano sales companies, and investors. It might not be so easy facing an entity that can seize assets. We'll see.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  18. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,256
    2,472
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    You're forgetting that Trump has to post bonds if he wishes to appeal. If Trump loses his appeals, the money is essentially sitting there to be collected.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Informative Informative x 3
  19. apkgator

    apkgator GC Hall of Fame

    10,194
    1,949
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    You realize that just because you keep posting this it isn't going to wish it true, don't you?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  20. Gatoragman

    Gatoragman GC Hall of Fame

    2,574
    243
    288
    Jan 4, 2008
    Ok, I understand the point. And, as I said I don't totally disagree and want fraud stomped out just as bad as you do. I just feel the DA ran on getting Trump and used obscure never been used this way before laws to get him. I think the judge would have awarded a judgement against Trump no matter what evidence was presented. That fraud needs to be stomped out also! I do have a question though, has it been published or put forth in the trial exactly what kind of rates Trump loans received vs the market rates at the time for loans of this nature? I do not know, just curious just how much of a financial benefit he may have received vs anyone else that would have been trying to receive the same rates for loans the size Trump took. The bankers wanted to land financials whales like this, same as casinos in Vegas and will provide unbelievable benefits to make that happen.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1