Trump's Troubles

Good quote about Trump from Nikki Haley's husband: “The difference between humans and animals? Animals would never allow the dumbest ones to lead the pack.”

Trump attacks Haley for absence of her husband, who is deployed | CNN Politics

 

Oh the irony. Trump just insulted his followers and himself

 

What a moron. Asking where her husband is when he is serving his country, while his own wife hasn't been seen with him since she told him he can't ride with her in the limo.

But those wearing his mark on their forehead aren't even smart enough to pick up on the stupidity of the comments.

 

The March -April trial will end up as one long campaign platform where, even if he loses, his followers will think he won.

 

I think I read he faces “up to” 4 years, but he might also get probation. It’s the least serious crime of the 4 criminal cases he faces.

 

Probably? I’m don’t do criminal law, so I know only a little about these things. However, there’s also the chance he wins this case. Cohen has proven to be a bad witness, as I understand it, he is a central witness to this case.

 

Big Fani and Lil Wade going down today.

 

I can usually figure out the angles even if they're silly. But what was the insinuation or upside supposed to be about Haley's husband? To counter the media speculation about Trump's marriage and where Melania has been?

 

Just Trump throwing crap against the wall about her marriage. Typical lowest common denominator garbage for him. His sycophants lap it up.

 

Firehose of bullshit is standard operating procedure in Trump world.

 

Even if - the criminal acts remain. RICO.

 

You can’t charge me cuz…..
A primer on trump’s various claims of why he should be considered to be above the rule of law.

 

Character assassinations of Katayal in 3, 2, 1....

 

I'm very curious to see what happens at SCOTUS with this. Neal is an attorney I follow who I think gives fairly objective analysis on these matters and has a lot of experience with the Supreme Court. For example, he was openly critical of the arguments made by the State of Colorado legal team and complimentary of Trump's attorney in the Colorado ballot case.

From what I've seen from Neal and others, the arguments by Trump's team are legally weak and may not merit SCOTUS taking this at all, so we'll see how much weight appointing three justices carries.

 

Agree with you on Katyal. I think he’s argued in the SC 50+ times. He usually makes a lot of sense to this layman.

 

More winning

 

pony up red hat suckers!