Try reading the Law and the Decision. If you did you would understand that is exactly what the law is designed to do and and the court upheld…
Not performing at all. But not going to back down from a small group that wants to legally allow the killing of the most innocent to misrepresent the situation…
Yep. The law can only help when the woman is in serious danger, life sepsis. Nothing can be done to prevent sepsis. And once in sepsis, women will have complications or die. Which is what the law is designed to do.
Nope. You continue to spew lies because you are not interested in the truth about the law or the decision!
So the women who had to leave the state for care are lying? The women who stayed and now have serious complications are lying? We know Glick isn't lying. She's dead. Or do you think her family is lying about that too?
Listen to the actual, real life experiences and ramifications from the women themselves! Tell them to read the law and the decision! Especially Glick!
Add the name Amanda Zurawski to the list of Texas women who couldn't get an abortion in time to save herself from serious complications. Ms. Zurawski's amniotic sac broke early (PPROM), but because the fetus still had a heartbeat, Texas law forbid an abortion. It was only until she went into full sepsis, which caused the fetus to die, could doctors act to save Ms. Zurawski's life. Unfortunately for her, the sepsis caused her to be infertile. Luckily, Ms. Zurawski didn't suffer the same fate as Ms. Glick, even though as many as 60% of women in sepsis do not survive. Ms. Zurawki, along with 22 other women in Texas, are suing the state to allow for abortions before the woman is in sepsis. The state of Texas has come back saying Ms. Z has no standing in the case, because she's now infertile, and can never get pregnant again! So, @QGator2414, care to take a trip to Texas, and tell the 23 women, to their face, they should have read the law an the ruling? If you go, please tell me. I'd love to record the interaction.
Yikes. They caused her infertility, then told her that her infertility meant she couldn't seek to change the law so that others didn't have to suffer like she did? That is some messed up stuff.
Yep, now that she is infertile - even though it was caused by the TX law itself, she no longer has legal standing to sue over reproductive rights.
Damn media reporting things that other people want to pretend don't exist so that they can convince themselves that they're still a good person. Time to do some more volunteer work while also voting to screw over those same people that they're volunteering to help.
