and we thought these rich elites on both sides of the aisle were only in bed together in a figurative sense....
So I’m reading this piece this am and come across this: The phone messages, while mostly mundane, give a small taste of those associations. “She had on the phone Mr. Harvey Weinstein,” reads one message about a missed call. Weinstein, then a force in Hollywood, was once part of a media investment group that included Epstein. “At the time, Epstein was seen as a wealthy power broker with access to many people of various industries and for many reasons,” said Weinstein’s spokesperson, Juda Engelmayer. “It wasn’t uncommon for people of that caliber to talk, as we see from the lists that have been coming out. There was and remains nothing more to that.” How does Harvey Weinstein still have a press flack? How can he afford one and how any human with a soul still be willing to spin for him? Talk about privilege and corruption
Newly reported details outline Trump as an Epstein pedi and Oh Lordy, there are tapes. Trump’s alleged ‘sexual proclivities’ graphically detailed in new Epstein documents
If you read the piece, there is likely not tapes, and they were not even alleged to be of Trump. Other salacious stuff though
I saw some comments on another site discussing the released photos. “The girls looked happy.” WTH? Keep an open mind with all this pedo revelation stuff. There are no party lines here.
Is there any chance that public outcry may lead to reopening investigations or has that ship sailed? I'm not one for conspiracies but there are so many rich and powerful people across the political spectrum and internationally that I can believe this was buried improperly.
I mean, there's really no evidence as far as we know. Flight logs and a victims testimony, unless I'm missing anything? That's not gonna get anyone arrested.
He had Rodgers back on and instead of apologizing he tried to say it wasn't an accusation against Jimmy Kimmel and that he meant that Kimmel would be mad that a list came out all, not that he'd be on it ... an explanation that doesn't make a whole lot of sense... Rodgers was clearly referring to a fake document being spread in the right wing moron sphere that said Kimmel had ties to Epstein ... “I said, that a lot of people, and I’m quoting myself here, ‘a lot of people — including Jimmy Kimmel — are really hoping thatdoesn’t come out,’ end quotes, that’s what I said,” Rodgers told McAfee. “I was referring to the fact that if there is a list — which again, this hasn’t come out yet, this was just a deposition — and there are names on it, then that would be the second time that a soft brain, junior college student, you know, wacko anti-vax, anti-Semite, purveyor, spreading misinformation, conspiracy theorists, MAGA — whatever other things have been said by him and other people in the media — would be right twice.” I guess that's why he's banned ... Aaron Rodgers blames media in response to Jimmy Kimmel’s comments about him | CNN
Pretty interesting...zero hesitation on 9/11 and JFK files but not so much on the Epstein files. You can make the claim that Trump may just want to protect other people who may be innocent from having their name associated with Epstein, but the next time Trump considers someone other than himself it will be the first time.
I would never be confused with a trump apologist. But I do t wholly disagree with him there. Guilt by association is a real thing, unless there’s evidence that someone actually did something wrong not sure it’s fair to tar everyone.
I fully agree with you that the names shouldn't be released. I'm just skeptical that Trump is being altruistic with his explanation. Also, didn't he say he was going to declassify all this kind of stuff during his 2016 campaign?
