That would be too good to be true. But then we would watch the Dawg fans convince themselves that it’s not a terminable offense as long as he beats Bama next year.
What are we supposed to do with a list of people who knew Epstein? Am I going to learn anything more about Trump by seeing his name on a flight log? If the documents indicated guilt of anyone I assume the police would have charged.
From all previous reporting, I don't think Trump will be directly implicated in traveling with Epstein. He had fallen out with him before those records started being kept. But Trump needs no association with Epstein to prove that he's a horrendous pedophile. He has created his own record of being a man who likes to sexualize and exploit children. And it's in his own words, including towards his own daughter. Disgusting is not a sufficient word.
I don’t disagree with your characterization of Trump. I, too, was hoping for something here that would take him off the board. But the list is what it is, and he doesn’t seem to be one of the people who owes an explanation.
Not be a debbie downer but none of this is going to matter, is it? The authorities already had access to this information so if they were going to make an arrest they already would have done so. Anyone whose name is on the list can make the same case "I didn't do anything wrong, and if I did, I would have been arrested already." At this point, short of photos or videos being discovered (and fat chance of that) it doesn't look like anything will happen to these other scumbags. The one I'd really like to see held accountable is Alan Dershowitz. His name is all over these and yet he was also Epstein's criminal lawyer who negotiated his sweetheart deal which not only gave immunity to Epstein but any of his co-conspirators as well. How on earth is that legal or acceptable?
I see. Now that he's a " Conservative Republican" (lol) he is morally pure. It was simply his party affiliation that made him a creep. And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
It truly does not matter to his worshippers. He could kill and eat a puppy on national tv and they would still vote for him. It's a cult.
Isn’t the statute of limitation expired on these potential crimes? Wouldn’t it be more of a civil liability?
I'm just not sure what that looks like if it hasn't already happened. Maybe he'll come out and say he's a democrat. That would probably do it.
Don’t really care about his worshippers. A legitimate felony conviction would render his worshippers irrelevant.
Yes, because if he was raping children with Epstein in the 90's that's all forgiven now because he's a republican.
