Only major to those who sit in front of their devices all day scouring fringe websites for gotchas. I guess that makes you something like, oh, I know; a major incel. Get a life my man. You might actually enjoy yourself.
The far right QAnon crowd is a contingent of incels who sit around all day scouring the internet for child grooming and rigged election conspiracy theories. You are correct, I’m definitely not a part of that crowd.
There are a couple of right wing posters who make “gotcha” threads targeting the left, funny how I never see you calling them incels and telling them to get a life.
They are equally abhorrent in my opinion as well. They are like incels as well and need to get lives. But they are not part of the conversation in this thread. The lefties are who think anyone who doesn’t know about these people are stupid and ignorant. What a ridiculous assertion. Maybe you fringe lefties need to hook up with this QAnon crowd and neither of you would need to be incels anymore.
LOL, meanwhile, you super-major incels start threads about what some random tik-tok user said, it's like half of what you guy post here ... you need to take your own advice and get a life ... and if you really can't remember a major news story from a few years ago, you might also want to see a doctor. I'm saying that because I care about incels like you.
Fringe websites? It was on every major news outlet for a month. Then he had a grazing standoff where they had snipers aiming at federal agents. Acting like this was fringe news is funny. Even funnier is the strip club pervert going around calling people incels because they remember national news.
LOL ... you are one babbling about "fringe sources" in a thread where I quoted the "The Independent", a highly rated source for factual reporting... you get what you give.
Well then start calling them out with the same energy and fervor that you have in here, and maybe I’ll start taking you seriously
In all fairness, the dogshit right wing newsrags these people get their news from didn’t cover the Bundy standoff when it happened back in 2014, they were too busy focused on what color suit the president at the time was wearing. So I can kind of understand why some righties didn’t know about that Bundy story.
LOL ... didn't know that about him. It must be a sad life to have a give a woman $20 so she will pretend to be into you for the length of a song.
TBH, it is hard to imagine that anyone who pays attention to national news,particularly when there's a heavy left/right slant, not knowing who the Bundy family is. There was a ton of coverage of both the 2014 and 2016 standoffs. They were hardly obscure events. Beyond that, Ammon Bundy has had his share of involvement in other news stories since. Still, it's always best to avoid calling other posters liars. Now, back to this particular story. His claims about the hospital and its staff were disgusting. Rather than man up and deal with the consequences of his actions, according to this story, he ran away and hid while claiming to be the victim and whining that others on the far right aren't doing enough to help him. Anyone here want to take his side?
Al had a nice two story house with two teenage kids, a very needy wife, and a large dog. Outside of the episode where they formed an a neighborhood watch, it seemed like a good neighborhood. Somehow he managed all that on the salary of a women's shoe salesperson. Give him more credit.
Bundy should have gotten some asset protection advice from whoever set up Alex Jones' plan. That said, I didn't know courts could put someone in jail for refusing to retract a statement that was found to be defamatory. Seems like a First Amendment problem to me?
The First Amendment doesn't protect defamation so I don't think there is an issue with the judge's order. The article says that deleting the false statements he had made about the hospital on the internet was a condition of his sentence, and he was held in contempt for not following through, then didn't show up at his contempt hearing, so the judge ordered his arrest. As far as his assets, who knows, he might be lying again for "fund raising" purposes ...
I've always thought of monetary damages as being the main (if not sole) remedy in defamation cases. That's why I thought that injunctions are, at the very least, rare even after a trial. We've had several cases recently (Trump and Rudy) who've been sued again for saying things. I don't think either was compelled to retract or if that relief was sought. I may look into the issue of courts compelling retractions out of curiosity. Either way, Bundy can obviously be held in contempt for skipping court.
