Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Gator Country Black Friday special!

    Now's a great time to join or renew and get $20 off your annual VIP subscription! LIMITED QUANTITIES -- for details click here.

Texas towns make it illegal to use roads to travel out of state for an abortion.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by ursidman, Sep 2, 2023.

  1. BobK89

    BobK89 GC Hall of Fame

    12,130
    447
    818
    Apr 9, 2007
    Tampa, FL
    I'm 56 and want a small government and have ZERO interest in supporting social conservatives.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  2. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,139
    1,196
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Does that mean you don’t want to meddle with, say - murder, theft, fraud, etc. ?
     
  3. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,139
    1,196
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    You mean sue her doctor who advised her that her baby, grievously challenged as it is, poses no threat to her health ? Put another way, sue her doctor because she didn’t hear what she wanted to hear ?
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  4. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,808
    819
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 2
  5. BobK89

    BobK89 GC Hall of Fame

    12,130
    447
    818
    Apr 9, 2007
    Tampa, FL
    Clearly not. I don’t want government wasting time on drag shows, for example, and criminalizing behavior that politicians don’t agree with.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,910
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    What do Republicans have to gain by "control" here?

    Abortion as an option is a convenience for everyone male or female outside the womb, so what exactly is the malicious motive here?

    Maybe, just maybe, their goal is actually preserving life, even though I think laws like this make for bad policy. It shouldn't be a crime to cross state lines to do something in another state that is entirely legal in that state.

    Even if you disagree with it, the pro-life stance is one rooted in principle, because abortion will always be a tough sell, not because it isn't immoral, but because the primary victims of abortion are people who can't speak and can't vote. It's convenient for everyone else.
     
  7. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,833
    1,001
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    No, I was asking about citizens of Texas potentially suing the out-of-state doctor that she's traveled to see.
     
  8. lacuna

    lacuna VIP Member

    63,350
    3,727
    2,353
    Apr 8, 2007
    Redlands, Colorado
    Why is it so many of your comments remind me of messages found on strips of paper baked inside Chinese fortune cookies? :ninja3:
     
  9. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,139
    1,196
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    My bad.
     
  10. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,139
    1,196
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I think you mentioned before that it was my penchant for responding to snark with snark (but being in the minority while doing it) that causes you to grind your teeth.
     
  11. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,910
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    I can only defend the intent.

    To me, the policy is only justified by an ends justify the means mentality. In other words, we're going to try and save as many fetuses as we can even if it means broadening the scope of our state's authority to an unreasonable degree... because it's all worth it in the interest of protecting life. That's a dangerous mentality to have, however, and we certainly can't have every state thinking that way or everything becomes a legal mess.

    What next? Is Texas going to lock people up for smoking weed in Amsterdam or seeing an escort in Vegas?
     
  12. lacuna

    lacuna VIP Member

    63,350
    3,727
    2,353
    Apr 8, 2007
    Redlands, Colorado
    Your snark goes to 11. Though entertaining at times I generally find it more an irritant. Usually best ignored, as one would be better served in ignoring a persistent irritating itch.
     
  13. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,910
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    I think some of this is just a cynical demographics game.

    Deter the hardcore pro-choicers from living in Texas because those folks tend to vote Democrat.
     
  14. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,910
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Who?
     
  15. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,139
    1,196
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I don’t believe in contagion. So I suspect your itch is a personal problem.
     
  16. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,139
    1,196
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I have read, but cannot confirm, that Kate Cox is a prop for people who are groping for an emotionally charged means to overturn Texas abortion law.

    After all, is there anything wrong with the existing law ? Does it not allow for abortions for mothers at risk ?

    It’s not like it hasn’t happened before. Check, it’s not like it’s not standard practice.
     
  17. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,910
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Yes you would. lol.

    People act like if they were around during actual slavery they would've been leading the emancipation efforts. Odds are, you would've been doing exactly what you're doing now. Maybe you have a particular cause that you devote your time to, but apart from the occasional small donation or virtue signaling to your buddies, you probably wouldn't have done shit.
     
  18. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,663
    2,570
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Odds are your opinion isn’t relevant. I don’t think slaves are being legally murdered in the US today so my conscious is clear. He believes babies are being legally murdered. What a wuss he is to stand by.
     
  19. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,910
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    They never have an answer for this question.

    They immediately resort to the most sympathetic circumstances or non-existent hypotheticals to justify the general rule.

    Which should tell you all you need to know about the general issue on the merits. And with respect to that, it's popular because the only people capable of having an opinion on it can't be aborted, but it's wrong because you're ending a life.
     
  20. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,139
    1,196
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    And of course the great irony here is that Texas law AND ruling are not going to kill anybody.