Dr. Swain would be well served to stop posting until she learns the actual facts, not the crap posted by @gatormonk 's "source."
I'm sure she would love to have your input. New Home - Dr. Carol Swain | Author | Speaker | TV Commentator
The truth is starting to emerge.: "However, Harvard professor Lobo, one of those allegedly plagiarized by Gay, told the Boston Globe: 'I find myself unconcerned about these claims as our work was explicitly acknowledged.'" Harvard President Claudine Gay is hit with plagiarism accusations - which she DENIES and says she 'stands by the integrity of my scholarship' as she faces pressure to step down after disastrous congressional hearing | Daily Mail Online
She should be talking to a lawyer before she continues. Read post #4 and learn something. Then share it with Rufo.
Furor over Harvard President Claudine Gay’s testimony continues as ‘academic integrity’ allegation against her surfaces - The Boston Globe
Yep, this is what happens when you have people, who obviously don't understand the meaning of a word like "plagiarism," making accusations. That makes two of her "victims" call this story BS. "Professor Gary King, a leading Harvard political scientist and one of Gay’s dissertation advisers whom she is also accused of plagiarizing, called the allegations, “false and absurd.” Dueling letters, ‘academic integrity’ claims add to furor over Harvard President Claudine Gay as key board meets - The Boston Globe
He is a board member with juice at New College of FL, yet despite his academic credentials does not know what plagiarism is. He must also be a podcaster
not sure if this was true or not but her opinion to me is worthless after what she said. If you were to change the race from jewish to black there is no doubt that they'd come down hard on this but it seems like upper education has no issue with supporting terrorists and being Nazis.
You can go ahead and link any thread I started without commentary. Here, Ill help ya.... click on my name, then "postings", then "all threads started by".
For all of Rufo's concerns over what is a permissible in quoting or using the words of another in one's own writing, his own colloquial use of get in the last sentence of his article slamming Claudine Gay was a poor choice. In the last sentence of his supposed expose' Rufo wrote, "If she has violated the code of academic conduct, she must resign—or get voted out by the board." In this article slamming her failure to clearly attribute the source of the passage by its lack of quotation marks, labeling that lack plagiarism - he affirmed standards he failed to use in his own writing. Better he should have written, 'If she has violated the code of academic conduct, she must resign—or be voted out by the board.' Is Claudine Gay a Plagiarist? I doubt it was intentional. Editors are supposed to catch and correct errors like this.