Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Does your local police allow Facebook comments?

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by ValdostaGatorFan, Dec 7, 2023.

  1. ValdostaGatorFan

    ValdostaGatorFan GC Hall of Fame

    2,848
    623
    1,998
    Aug 21, 2007
    TitleTown, USA
    I see. A limited public forum closer to a town hall meeting.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    19,286
    6,522
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Or possibly a designated public forum. There are colorable arguments in favor of both forums. But a government is allowed to close either one.
     
  3. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,228
    1,771
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I don’t really have an opinion on the FB page thing.

    However watching that video affects me viscerally as a parent of an autistic kid. There were plenty of instances where my kid said and did inappropriate things. Heck my bipolar daughter even bit a teacher once. We were really lucky that school teachers staff and even on site security officers always handled themselves appropriately. There were occasions where restraint was used but all instances were reasonable.

    Listening to that cop talking to that kid “bite me again” makes me incredibly angry. In a bit of irony, my bipolar daughter, who at times made it difficult for teachers, now works doing ABA with autistic children and has been bitten and had large toys thrown at her head. If she can deal with it this POS cop ought to be able to. F him.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 2
  4. ValdostaGatorFan

    ValdostaGatorFan GC Hall of Fame

    2,848
    623
    1,998
    Aug 21, 2007
    TitleTown, USA
    I bet that was tough to watch. It's great that you're daughter is doing what she's doing. I don't have kids, and that video made me pretty angry. Unfortunately, It's not the first time law enforcement has employed unreasonable violence on a special needs child, and it won't be the last.

    The thing is, no one in the school asked the officer to intervene. They were just having a conversation with the child. The kid wasn't having a fit or anything. The cop initiated the violence by putting the 2nd grader in an arm lock and forcing him into a side room. This 280 pound man bloodied the face of a 2nd grader by slamming his face on the floor and grinding it until he got rig burns.

    Its alleged that when the father asked him why he put his hands in his child, the cop replied “because as a law enforcement officer, that’s my primary function.” It's also alleged that the cop accessed, or tried to access, confidential records on the kid to put in his report. The lawsuit also alleges that the a-hole cop "was not disciplined or even restrained by the Laramie County Sheriff's Department. "

    And finally, to absolutely no one's surprise, the family says that the were informed by LCSO that the deputies actions were “appropriate and justified.”
     
  5. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,228
    1,771
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    It is probably a function of being a smaller more rural type area people aren’t going to have the same level of experience and training as a large urban area like we do.

    I never had an issue if one of my kids were restrained if it was the result of an extreme behavior. Dealing with special needs kids is tough and such people deserve some grace. If you have a special needs kid the probability is high you will have an encounter with law enforcement or child protective services or both. But in an instance like that where the kid is treated forcibly and injured and there was no provocation that is over the line.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,805
    815
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    I don't have a problem with government controlling what goes on their sites on private platforms. I have a problem with the platforms doing the controlling for everybody else.
     
  7. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,228
    1,771
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    So you have a problem with private platforms controlling what happens on private platforms.

    If I started spamming the board with calls for a Democrat-FSU-Muslim sharia law, and GC decided to delete it, you have a big problem with that.
     
  8. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    5,554
    2,913
    2,698
    Dec 3, 2019
    Did a bot just bump this thread?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    I see no issue with them limiting comments on THEIR page. The Constitution protects you from them restricting YOUR page.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Yep :D
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  11. antny1

    antny1 GC Hall of Fame

    5,554
    2,913
    2,698
    Dec 3, 2019
    A local dept in my area had their page continuously spammed by people who didn't even live in florida, many of whose accounts had locked profiles or were spam accounts. The department deserves a heavy dose of criticism for reasons that have been discussed in valdostas police thread but spamming community activity posts and other information postings isn't the way to do it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,738
    2,194
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Did they post about Robert Barnes?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. archigator_96

    archigator_96 GC Hall of Fame

    4,148
    3,643
    1,923
    Apr 8, 2020
    Since FB is not a required instrument of info for municipalities to use then they can manage however they want. If they don't want to deal with the heat from instances like this then don't have one at all. But like @gator_lawyer said, you can't pick and choose which issues you allow the public to weigh in on.
    If people still want to say something, they can post on their own FB page or their own social media account.