Meanwhile, back on Planet America, the left largely controls politics, the media and the academies, has won the culture war and can cancel pretty much anyone they want. But it’s Trump we need to worry about.
That's because Fascist dictators are a danger. First, Trump will come for the immigrants, and if the people do nothing, they better hope there will be people around when Trump turns his attention on to them.
"What Conservatives Really Think of Democracy," a fairly long article, but here’s the gist of it: “In his remarks, however, Santorum was ultimately expressing a deeper right-wing animus toward democracy as such — an animus that has only seemed to grow as the United States becomes more pluralist and socially liberal. Whereas the conservatives of the Reagan era frequently claimed to represent a “Moral Majority” of old-fashioned American values and everyday common sense, Republicans today are often quite open about their hostility to popular democracy and majority rule. The reason for this rhetorical shift is obvious: on both “social” issues like trans rights and abortion and economic questions like the value of unions and the tax rates rich people should pay, conservatism has very much become a minority proposition in today’s United States.” MSN This well explains why supporters of Trump would be perfectly okay with authoritarian rule, or in a word dictatorship, in America. No one should keep wondering why in the world people would continue to support a criminal, traitor and wannabe dictator like Trump for president of this country. He’s just the man for what they want.
first, I have no idea what you’re referring to with “cases you cited”. Did you post a legal brief? Second, I didn’t insult you, I just pointed out how wrong you are. You posted that Trump filed for bankruptcy. You didn’t post that Trump’s businesses filed for bankruptcy. And when I call you out on it, you deflect it. Just admit you got it wrong. Fix it. Move on. There is no debate here.
Post 326. Still, OK. I admit that I was wrong to attempt to have a reasoned and logical debate with a cultist. Time to move on.
how pathetic you must feel every morning knowing when you wake up that you live in a house of lies. You have absolutely zero defense on what I called you out on. Zero!
In this thread he's calling you out for failing to distinguish between Trump and Trump's businesses, which are essentially the same thing. In another thread he's blaming the governor of California because LAPD took away some guy's concealed carry permit. You can't debate with someone who is that intellectually dishonest. They just change the rules as they see fit.
The headlines are cast as "Radical" and "Unprecedented" because the ideas are in actuality radical and unprecedented. Does that not make sense?
I already responded to that post (#329). Remember what Sun Tsu said: if you stick a microscope up the Pope’s ass you are bound to find shit.
This post is another effort to help Trump establish his authoritarianism by causing Americans to drop their vigilance, which would make it a lot easier for him to accomplish his goal of instituting a dictatorship with him at the helm. Seriously, by casting this as not so real or alarming, when you KNOW that it IS so real and alarming, you are purposely aiding Trump's anti-democracy initiatives.
l agree. And every other candidate is doing the exact same thing. What candidate says “I’m going to continue the same shit show you hate for the next four years”? Radical = Comprehensive Unprecedented = Novel CNN knows that blasting Trump’s policies will be “Comprehensive and Novel” vs the negative spin they have won’t get nearly the outrage. Rage on, folks. Rage on.
Two things: (1) There could not be a dumber post here if you tried harder. You are clueless on corporate law. Donald Trump may be slightly more legally related to a corporation than he is to you. May be. (2) He did distinguish between Trump and Trump’s business. Here is what he said We can add in his bankruptcies, the multiple class action lawsuits his companies lost for defrauding people,…
Too funny. You create the tiniest little distinctions if it suits you, then no distinctions at all if that suits you. Just pure intellectual dishonesty. Now tell us again how there's now way we can determine what Hitler meant by the term 'blood poisening'.
you need to stop posting about things in which you are clearly clueless. There are libraries full of books, articles, treatises, case law and such on this “distinction” which you ignorantly call “tiny”. On to the Hitler side track. Try harder. Go back and read my posts. I ask a few basic questions. Report back here with answers to those questions and we can discuss the issue, otherwise I moved on from that fairytale complaint days ago. Just another diversion from the orange man bad crowd. ver·min /ˈvərmən/ noun wild animals that are believed to be harmful to crops, farm animals, or game, or that carry disease, e.g., rodents. parasitic worms or insects. "his clothes are infested with vermin" people perceived as despicable and as causing problems for the rest of society. "the vermin who ransacked her house" Communists: vermin Marxist: vermin Fascist : vermin Radical left thugs: vermin Which one of the 4 groups above aren’t despicable or don’t cause problems for society? I notice the definition of vermin does not include any reference to Hitler or white supremacy. Help a brother out: post a link to a definition that does include such a reference (from a reputable source of course.) Thanks Bro.
