Was there any doubt the loss would be blamed on voting integrity? VIRGINIA: In Tight Race, Officials Miraculously Find 15,000 Mostly Dem Votes On USB Flash Drive Amid accusations of massive battleground state election fraud meant to swing the Presidential race for Democrat Joe Biden, outraged voters in the 7th District of Virginia are sounding the alarm after incumbent Democrat Abigail Spanberger was propelled to victory by the discovery of nearly 15,000 early absentee votes stored on a thumb drive in the Richmond suburb of Henrico County. In a chain of events similar to those that have played out around the country, with roughly 85% of votes reported as being tallied, Republican challenger Nick Freitas, as well as President Donald Trump, led their respective races in the 7th District by a wide margin, only to see those leads evaporate the next day following the ballots’ apparent discovery.
Abortion is pretty overwhelming in support-of among the electorate. But in red states where the pols *only* have to worry about primary voters, that’s where you see them push extremist policy. This mostly cuts across the Deep South, but you see them trying in Midwest and FL too. It’s the same deal on gun reform. Some of the measures poll even more crazily, like 87% in support-of, but GOP pols don’t care because there is no penalty for them blocking it (in fact they continually get rewarded by NRA). Odd that the abortion issue seems to matter more electorally, even though the poll numbers aren’t as overwhelming as some of the gun reform issues. But I guess it really gets the women voters angrier to have to deal with that crap.
Not to be insulting but I don’t care what your opinion is and why should your opinion count in a decision being made by a woman and her medical provider. I also don’t think my opinion matters either but the difference is you think your belief is more important than a woman’s or a medical professional.
Abortion, like any other medical procedure, should be between the patient and doctor. Politicians choosing an arbitrary fetal age and interfering between a woman, family, and doctor is the issue and where Rs have lost the battle. For example, a woman who discovers she is carrying a non-viable fetus beyond a politician-defined limit, should have a discussion with her Ob/Gyn to make a decision on aborting. Instead, too many examples of women being forced to carry to term and watch the child die in her arms. Cruel. And the dark side to criminalizing physicians is creating maternity care deserts, increasing infant mortality.
The new maga hero and House speaker Mike Johnson co sponsored a bill banning nationwide abortions after fertilization “the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being at all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual comes into being." He also supported Lousiana’s abortion ban. Rape, incest exceptions to Louisiana abortion ban rejected by GOP lawmakers
Most Republican politicians support a near total ban. rape and incest based anbortiins are generally rare. The problem with 6 weeks is it is effectively a near total ban. The six week clock starts at the beginning of the cycle, weeks befire the act of conception. The earliest a woman could know she was pregnant is at 4 weeks, when a period is missed. That would give you all of two weeks to have the abortion. Given that periods can be inconsistent it may not be obvious at all until it is too late. Also, if it is at 6 weeks, which is really 2 weeks, the number of abortions would be very small, plus abortion clinics would have the burden of figuring out if they were in the two week window otherwise they could be subject to civil or criminal penalties. So basically abortion clinics just shut down. Which is what most anti abortioners want. You may be right about 12-24 weeks. Red states may support in the earlier side of that window but purple states like VA clearly weren’t plussed by the 15 week proposal. I think there could be a good faith effort to come up with something but I don’t think there is good faith out there. Those on the right are dead set on getting their way whatever the cost. Those on the left don’t want to give and inch because of “slippery slope”. Those on the left on abortion are the same as those on the right are with guns. They feel any concession will lead to a total ban. In Europe many countries have a limit around 13 weeks, but they have fairly liberal exceptions that are determined by doctors, not by politicians, law enforcement and lawyers.
GOP flips New York seat held by Democrats for 20 years: ‘Political earthquake’ | Fox News Republican Ed Romaine defeated Democrat Dave Calone on Tuesday to become the first Republican to win the Suffolk County executive position in 20 years. Romaine won with 56% of the vote by a margin of 26,000 votes, The Associated Press projected. The Republican victory builds on the "red wave" that has swept across Long Island in recent years, which political analysts have attributed to spiking crime and the liberal push to defund police. "For the third year in a row, [Republicans] in New York had a great night, defeating incumbents and winning upset elections across the state," New York GOP Chairman Ed Cox said in a statement, adding that Long Island has become a "Republican bastion."
First Bronx Republican on NYC council in 50 years says she'll even try to work with OAC (nypost.com) Newly elected City Councilwoman Kristy Marmorato says it won’t be easy being the first Bronx Republican to hold a City Council seat in 50 years — but she vowed to stand for conservative values like education and public safety while even working with the likes of AOC. “It’s tough being a Republican in The Bronx,” she told The Post Wednesday. “I listened to people and they appreciated that.” The 45-year-old health care worker said that high on her list of priorities are school choice, strengthening the NYPD and stopping a controversial halfway house in her north Bronx district.
So, using your thought process, we are not allowed to have an opinion on anything that we are not directly involved in? I'll note that for your future comments!!
I agree, that is why I have always thought you need to have exceptions and I think practically all R's feel the same way. Where we must differ is that at some point in the womb, up for discussion when, the child should have some rights and not be subjected to killing it.
It takes 60 votes, he and all of know it will never happen. Can you not admire a person who is voicing their convictions, even though they know it will never happen?
This man will be glad to decide for American women what their "choice" will be if we can't park this dead horse and tackle higher priorities.
His opinion may not matter, but you conveniently neglected (as always) to even recognize that there is a nother human life with some skin in the game. Just no voice. Not yet anyway. PS--what happens to that human life is called KILLING.
Ironically, it was the early pro-aborts who designated an arbitrary safe-from-killing age: basically birth or at least looking like the Gerber baby.
