Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

War in Ukraine

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by PITBOSS, Jan 21, 2022.

  1. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,307
    1,846
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    Even the French are spending money on national defense. Oui! Mon Dieu! They are tripling their production of 155mm artillery shells.

    French firms to triple 155mm ammo production, boost weapons output

     
  2. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,307
    1,846
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    It bears repeating: our biggest expense (other than entitlements) is national defense. Get rid of (or disable) our enemies (on the cheap, if possible), and that expense goes way down. Do you like spending money on weapons that we sometimes never use? Why do you need to spend so much money on national defense? Are you a defense-aholic?
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,422
    2,513
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    And it has one on the best names ever for a weapons system.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,775
    22,540
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    The Biden admin. has dragged their feet and been No, No, Yes on all these weapon systems. Needs to change now if not last week.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,307
    1,846
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    I suspect that if Putin's health took a serious downward turn, he would stop traveling. He wouldn't have made the trip to China if he were really near the end.
     
  6. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,648
    1,155
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Aren’t you a killrussians-holic ? Don’t you need lots of expensive weapons for that ?
     
  7. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,003
    14,302
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    You seem to have mistaken me for a member of the house of representatives. I don't get to vote on expenditures. I only get to vote for candidates, and my options are quite limited.

    But why would you bypass entitlements and go straight for defense?

    If it were up to me, id say put it ALL on the $%&#@n table, and get to hacking, until we're running consistent surpluses.
     
  8. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,648
    1,155
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    We have something like 900 military bases or garrisons in something like 80 countries. We could bring all of our boys and girls home, cut our military budget in half, cut it in half again … and no ten countries combined would or could invade our shores let alone subjugate our populace.

    Now proceed with entitlements …
     
  9. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    6,571
    2,472
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    Is Dugger the successor?
     
    • Funny Funny x 5
  10. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,831
    11,896
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Wonder if history will ever know the truth about it all
     
  11. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,831
    11,896
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Do we know if it is him? Is there a more controlled environment for putin ii to master his craft?
     
  12. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,003
    14,302
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Is that real? That's hilarious!

    Can we use one for Joe Biden? :D:p:D
     
  13. defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
  14. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,678
    2,013
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Absolutely no idea. If you ask me, the bridge is fair game.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  15. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,678
    2,013
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    If he is, wait till they brief on the actual count of Russian casualties.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,831
    11,896
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    how much will it impact use of russain air support by forcing those helicopters and planes to move back 200 + miles from the lines?
     
  17. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,422
    2,513
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Will you PLEASE take this to another thread so that people can discuss the war in Ukraine?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  18. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,707
    1,053
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Thanks for bringing this information. He has to die someday but I’m not going to get my hopes up that it’s 1) anytime soon, or 2) that it will actually change anything until we see concrete evidence otherwise.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  19. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,707
    1,053
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think it’s fair game too but part of me wonders if it would be better to leave it so the citizens that want to live in Russia have an easier way to exit Crimea. I assume the strategic gain of demolishing that bridge far outweighs the consideration of a portion of the population preferring Russian to Ukrainian rule.
     
  20. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,678
    2,013
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    It would take helicopters completely out of the close fight, so that would not be option for Russia anymore than it would be for us under similar circumstances. That is just too far away for any practical effect. If I were Russia, I would disperse my fleet more, cover and conceal them to the best of my ability, and move them around randomly instead of working exclusively from airbases. All of those measures increase the pain and effort on Russia, though. And, still, Ukraine is going to nail some helicopters on the ground.