Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Netanyahu tells Israel ‘We are at war’ after Hamas launches an unprecedented attack, killing at leas

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gatorrick22, Oct 7, 2023.

  1. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,408
    1,802
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    This is pretty below the belt you’re normally a level headed poster, this is sad on your part.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 4
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  2. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    86,775
    25,988
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yep, how many Billions of Dollars have Obama and Biden given to the biggest exporter of terrorism on Earth? Yet, it's Trumps fault? That is real tangible proof of crimes against humanity, in this case crimes against the Israelis.

    Watch the defenders of terrorism... cash to Iran, that's stated goal in to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth, come out and negative rep this...

    These disgusting people can't explain away the funding of Iran/Hamas.

    Obama needs to explain that 150 billion dollar giveaway to that terrorist nation. And Biden was part of that and the 6 billion he recently gave to Iran.


    NO MONEY... NO TERRORISM.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2023
    • Dislike x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner x 1
    • Come On Man x 1
  3. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,499
    2,734
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Some information. Don't have telegram but seems significant

     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,465
    792
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Oh I think it’s even more infantile than that

    Israel’s success or failure is irrelevant to this. Trump cares not. Bibi has betrayed Trump by cozying up to the current U.S. President (as any Israeli prime minister will of course do by default). With Trump, this is a personal affront. Trump feels Netanyahu “owes” him total loyalty. Literally same words he used against Mike Pence after 1/6 “he let us down”.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,624
    5,112
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Maybe calculus was the wrong word. Because the thinking was arithmetic level. Early in This thread I posted that I would not get involved in my assessment of what went in on Israel in the interest of unity. That is something to address later. Let’s leave it at that for now.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,507
    1,878
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    I'm not even sure a10s have really ever seen combat outside the Middle East. Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan, ISIS.... Crazy for a 50 year old plane. Might as well just keep them all stationed there.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,499
    2,734
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Pretty much the same for all US weapons systems
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,049
    955
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    “This page is titled "raid plan" on the Kibbutz of Mefalsim, and says that the contents include various maps and intelligene items on the area (not all of which are even included in the document)

    For example, the document says that the battle plan outlines that the attack will consists of a commander and 2 squads of five people.

    The page also suggests that this is "phase A" of the attack.”


    “This page depicts an operational schedule for command and control. It includes ID numbers of commanders.

    It also says that the raid on Mefalsim is "B14" and includes designations on which member is meant to "open a hole" in the fence. Another team is meant to provide "artillery."”


    “In this image, it discusses the Israeli presence in Mefalsim. It says that there are "1,000 civilians" (direct translation to civilians). Of this, they claim 20 of them are a rapid response team.

    It also says that there are additional Israeli forces that could arrive to the area from "nahal oz" - within 3-5 minutes. They discuss that these forcs from Nahal Oz would arrive from "Outpost 16" along road 232, in the form of "2-3" jeeps.”


    “This page is the most important of the document. It lays out "tasks" of what is designated as the "basic force" (possibly an allusion to the primary force penetrating the kibbutz).
    According to point #7, the force is tasked to "take prisoner soldiers, residents, and take hostages for negotiations."”
     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,507
    1,878
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Fair point
     
  10. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,499
    2,734
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Thanks. Very helpful
     
  11. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,336
    1,289
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    So they were planning this for at least a year if it’s dated 10/22. Having said that, I’m not sure if this really looks all that sophisticated. Seems like pretty straightforward intelligence that could be gathered through observation & planning.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,336
    1,289
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,465
    792
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Somebody had to observe. I.e a spy or intel assistance from outside. It could have been done in a crude way (just sending individual Hamas members across the border to spy, a scary thought for residents of the area). But they could have also had outside intel help. Maybe both.
     
  14. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,565
    956
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    My understanding is that Hamas is Sunni, as are most Palestinians and the people of Gaza specifically. Is it relevant that a Shia country - Iran - backs a Sunni group (Hamas)? Do the intra-Islam debates just not matter when it comes to Israel or maybe I’ve been overestimating the extent to which the distinction matters generally?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,624
    5,112
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    No. Jews are the enemy of both. Which is why they are aligned in this. Before “me against you,” it’s “me and you against our enemy.”
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,624
    5,112
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    They are always training for these attacks. The question operationally is how they got past the border fence with no one knowing it responding for so long.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. cron78

    cron78 GC Hall of Fame

    1,033
    441
    238
    Feb 25, 2022
    Marvelous and effective birds IMHO, particularly when our guys have air superiority. Interested to hear what uftaipan thinks about them.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,049
    955
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    You’re correct that Hamas (and nearly all Gazans) are Sunni.

    Historically there was an “axis of resistance” that consisted of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Syrian regime, and Iran that supported one another. All of those other than Hamas are Shia (technically Assad is Alawite, but that’s an offshoot of shiism).

    As for the reasons Iran supports a Sunni militant organization? As Duchen noted, primarily because of a shared hatred of Israel. Secondarily, because Iran thinks that being the patron of a major Palestinian combatant group gives it broader credibility in the region which is useful in its smoldering rivalry with Saudi Arabia to dominate Middle Eastern politics.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2023
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. cron78

    cron78 GC Hall of Fame

    1,033
    441
    238
    Feb 25, 2022
    Terrible thoughts follow, so be forewarned. So the wife and I over pizza at a restaurant tonight (and a couple Hooter Browns for me) discussed many topics but touched briefly on the topic at hand, including the killing of babies. Initial reports of dozens in one location, then reports of no confirmation, then reports of apparent confirmation. She thought of a theory that hadn’t occurred to me. What if there was a Hamas directive to specifically kill children because that eliminates an entire family tree of people; vs. killing adults which eliminates parts of but not entire family trees. Removing children eliminates another generation or two more than killing an adult. That seems to fit the directive in the Hamas statement of purpose (charter?). I don’t like typing this, but if the theory has merit it is, indeed, terrible. Was she way off base?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. littlebluelw

    littlebluelw GC Hall of Fame

    6,334
    825
    2,068
    Apr 3, 2007
    Well since their stated mission is to exterminate Jews in their sick minds the ends justify the means.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2