Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Border Wall

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by defensewinschampionships, Oct 5, 2023.

  1. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,691
    1,700
    3,068
    Jan 6, 2009
    It’s my understanding that 2022 and this year there will be around 3 million “encounters” each year, which does not include people who get in who don’t get caught. So do you think we can effectively assimilate 3 million a year?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    11,808
    1,085
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    It's not just what was happening in 1879. It's the millions of guest worker who came legally under the Bracero Program between WWII and 1963. It's the 1 million undocumented who became citizens in 1986 ( about half who were eligible). And it's about the approximately 8 million undocumented immigrants currently in our workforce. Notice a pattern?

    Not only has our border never been secure, for the last few generations, we've had a demand for immigrant labor. At one point, we had a very successful guest worker program. Racism ended it. Since then, the flow of undocumented workers have been coming, and everything we've tried to slow them down, let alone stop them, has failed.

    We should learn from the past and do what worked, and avoid what doesn't. The Bracero Program worked. Draconian laws not only don't work, they wreak economic havoc.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  3. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    15,793
    5,477
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Assuming your numbers are accurate, three million encounters =/= three million distinct people.

    Nor does every person who comes seek asylum. And of that group, some of them won't pass the credible fear interview.
     
  4. UFLawyer

    UFLawyer GC Hall of Fame

    6,409
    417
    198
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    you claim our borders have never been secure, then conclude that we should learn from the past and stay the course. So to summarize your position you just want open borders.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  5. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    11,808
    1,085
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    Our borders have never been secure. May never be as long as there is a demand for immigrant labor and an ample supply in countries to our south. Our best plan in our history? The Bracero Program. We should copy it. What hasn't worked? Boondoggle walls and draconian laws. We should leave those in the dustbins of history.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  6. LimeyGator

    LimeyGator Official Brexit Reporter!

    Perhaps an unpopular outside opinion.

    I don't see any issue with protecting your borders from non-legal immigration. If it's a wall, so be it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. UFLawyer

    UFLawyer GC Hall of Fame

    6,409
    417
    198
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    ask China if walls work. Ask Berlin if walls work. We have never had a wall, so your comment about it not working is asinine. We’ve had a partial wall. Look at it this way, if you built a house and only put up two walls, do you expect to be able to keep people and creatures out? The answer is no. What our immigration system is lacking right now is enforcement. We already have laws that prohibit people from just walking in, and we need to enforce those laws. And those laws need to be tougher. If you walk into my house without permission, you are never invited back into my house. It is a simple as that. Since everybody wants to come to my house, you’re not going to risk it. And if you do, you don’t deserve to come back.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. gatormonk

    gatormonk GC Hall of Fame

    7,216
    6,415
    2,603
    Apr 3, 2007
  9. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,446
    1,967
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    When we ask the Chinese, should we ask the Ming Dynasty representatives, who built much of the wall, or the Qing dynasty, who marched through it from Manchuria to take over? When we ask the representatives of Berlin, should we ask the people that literally tore down the wall or the ones that were around before then?
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. UFLawyer

    UFLawyer GC Hall of Fame

    6,409
    417
    198
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    You can ask any Chinese…because they all know their history and the importance of the Wall. Or you can ask any American who read a history book for a much more watered down version of the wall’s importance, which, given your question may be more appropriate for your intellect.

    As for the Berlin Wall, you can actually watch videos of the wall’s function on YouTube. But to really get a feel for its effectiveness ask an old east Berliner. There are still plenty of those alive. However, I suggest you ask an 8 year old German Child to get the information from their grandparents first, then explain it to you, since…..well….you know.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,446
    1,967
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    I'm just wondering if I should ask the people that are descendants of the multiple Han dynasties who built the wall or the multiple dynasties of people who invaded from the North and took over. Are both of them "Chinese," because the wall builders certainly didn't think so?

    Bold move questioning intellect when you have no clue about the history of the Great Wall apparently. The history was that it was built over centuries and breached often. It has been more important to China as a tourist attraction than it ever was as a defensive measure, as it failed in the latter purpose quite often. But I'm guessing you didn't know that, did you?

    So what you are saying is don't ask these folks?

    [​IMG]

    BTW, fun fact about the Berlin Wall, it has now been torn down for longer than it was functional.

    But I do find it fascinating that you want to be more like East Germany.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. kygator

    kygator GC Hall of Fame

    3,072
    142
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    Berlin Wall was very effective. They tore down the wall after they announced that the border was open.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  13. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,446
    1,967
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Not really true. A crowd overwhelmed the checkpoints, then the government announced that they wouldn't use deadly force any longer to guard the border. The night when this happened is generally recognized as when the wall came down (November 9).
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  14. kygator

    kygator GC Hall of Fame

    3,072
    142
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    The reason there were so many people at the checkpoints is because it was announced that the borders were now open. Are you really arguing that the border was just as easy to cross when there was a wall and when there wasn’t?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  15. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,446
    1,967
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Not true actually. The government mistakenly announced that international travel would be allowed (not that the border was open) and the crowds overwhelmed the checkpoints. Regardless, from a strategic standpoint, a police state managed to keep its citizens in with a wall for a few decades before those citizens overwhelmed that police state and caused its downfall. Is that the sort of strategic success we are looking for here?
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    122,029
    162,838
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Isn't there a difference between a wall built to keep people "in" (Berlin Wall) and one built to keep people out?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. kygator

    kygator GC Hall of Fame

    3,072
    142
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    It was still in the order that I initially stated, even though you falsely claimed that it wasn’t.

    The difference is we would still allow immigration and travel. A wall at our border would simply reduce illegal crossings. Yes, there would still be some.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    2,586
    674
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Texas: we need border security
    Federal Govt: ok
    Texas: we don’t want big govt
    Fed Govt: ok
    Texas: you don’t do anything. We want to secede
    Fed Govt: ok. Good luck. You’ll have to tax the crap out of your citizens for national defense.
    Texas: wait, wut?
     
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1
  19. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    11,808
    1,085
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    Here's a good article about the efficacy, or lack thereof of the Great Wall of China. Basically, the Wall was easy to breach and was only as effective as the people manning it. Our wall would be nearly 2000 miles long, and manning it would be quite expensive.

    In contrast, the Berlin wall was 92 miles long. And it was breached often and early until it was finished then fortified.

    The Isreali wall in about 400 miles long, and breached by thousands of Palestinians daily who come to work. Palestinians who probably won't be happy with recent events because the Israelis will likely step up border patrols. Proving again, a wall is only as effective as the people manning it.

    One major difference between the Great Wall and a US border wall is we're not protecting ourselves from military invaders who want to conquer us. Literally millions have come in through the decades, and nobody has tried to conquer the US. It's not a worry.

    Even with technology, "manning" a 2000 wall will be cost prohibitive. A lot of the border areas are difficult to get to, and are in extreme climate areas. Moving people back and forth, and maintaining tech in these areas won't be easy or cheap. And the people in the other side wishing to enter? I would bet they would quickly find weaknesses and exploit them.

    Again, we can follow historically bad policies and repeat the same mistakes, throwing good money after bad. Or, we can do what two bipartisan committees suggested and start with an expanded guest worker program. A program we I've had (Bracero) that was very effective.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  20. UFLawyer

    UFLawyer GC Hall of Fame

    6,409
    417
    198
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida

    There are literally thousands of written resources, not including the hundreds of documentaries on the Great Wall.

    You seem to be suggesting that the wall was not built to keep people out, or that it was not successful. Both assertions are wrong. Has the wall been breached? Yep. Is it perfect? Nope. Your post is beyond ridiculous.

    The Great Wall of China
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 8, 2023
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1