It wasn’t that bad. Missed opportunities Missed blocks Head scratchers Haven’t looked at the D review yet
Interesting from an offensive perspective. More than a few misreads by Metz, to include some opportunities downfield. Some play calling is mystifying.
Defense was similar. Players in position just not making plays. Overruns, leveraging the wrong direction, missing tackles etc. Silver lining....better than Granthams calls.
It’s interesting that these dudes lay out what Florida has to do from a schematic perspective to win…. Then Florida doesn’t do it, they lose, they breakdown what Napier did or did not call …. And yet, ppl still are critical. They miss stuff… and it’s not always on the coaches (missed assignments, mertz missing reads) but if this was in a court of law… Napier playcalling would be criminal and this would be admissible evidence
Sorry . . . inadmissible for lack of sufficient expertise to be recognized and testify as an expert witness. Overruled. LOL!
As discussed above, the defense had guys in position, they just missed tackles or went for wrong angle. This is attributed to youth. Mostly on players, perhaps some on Armstrong, but something that time will improve. The offense was different. Bad playcalls, zero tempo, zero creation of matchups to negate Kentucky’s advantages and hide our disadvantages, forcing runs on third and long, predictable calls on first down, etc. This isn’t youth, this is 100% coaching. Our young players can only run what they are told to run. And special teams……yikes. This is past coaching this is complete lack of coaching.
