Seems pretty obvious to me what he's saying ... Trump never apologized after they were exonerated ... focus on the difference that his correct use of "have" (verse "had") in that sentence.
Your entire argument is based my original apparently use of the incorrect tense in my original post. Once again it should have been obvious that I was referring to Trump's failure to apologize for his full page ad after the five men were exonerated for a crime for which they were convicted and for which the former president strongly suggested warranted capital punishment.
the irony of you bitching about someone refusing to apologize for being wrong, while simultaneously refusing to apologize yourself when you’re shown to be wrong.
Maybe it's just me but I think there is absolutely no comparison for my admitted grammatical error and Trump's refusal to apologize for calling the execution of five persons who turned out to be innocent of a crime for which they were accused and later convicted.
so the requirement for an “apology” depends upon the “degree” of error, as determined by you….who of course was elected to this position by you, and answers to only………wait for it.. You! Got it.
So you think that an unintentional grammatical error is the equivalent to calling for the execution of innocent men (teens at the time)? Got it. And if it will make you happy, I'm sorry that I made the error. By the way I'm still waiting for the defeated indicted former president to apologize for fomenting the violence at the Capital on January 6, 2021 or his promulgation of the myth that his predecessor was not born in the United States.
I feel like I’m owed an apology for having to read through an argument on a misplaced modifier (or whatever) and how it relates to executions somehow.
why are you relying on the term “equivalent?” Is that a new standard that you created? You called me out for something which you now contend was your error. It wasn’t my error. I don’t care if you apologize….I just thought it was ironic that you were demanding an apology from Trump for saying something you believe was in error, while acknowledging your own error without offering your own apology. I’m just making observations, no judgement. You and I are still best buds.
The concept of equivalence was rather obvious in your last post to which I was responding and by the way given your propensity to have the last word, I'm conceding and will not respond to another post from you on this subject. Not going to waste my time arguing over trivial distinctions.
And I trust Trump more than any of them to pursue the agenda I want to see, with the exception of maybe Vivek, who has zero chance of winning. I’m in the plurality now, so you’ll just have to get over it. A plurality of Americans want Trump. Deal with it.
Dems screwed up badly; overplaying their hand on the legal front with Trump. If it had been one indictment, they could have maintained plausible objectivity. With the multiple indictments, the 91 felony counts, along with the plethora of others indicted alongside him, the Dems validated everything Trump was saying about them, in the minds of the American people. If you look at the polling numbers, there is a noticeable shift of about 3 points in Trump’s favor occurring right after the infamous Fulton county mugshot. When a mugshot causes a candidate’s polling numbers to spike, the opposition overplayed their hand.
